S3 More Shannon "Trauma Troll" Nasties
Introduction
The previous post in this series on Shannon was this one, Shannon The “Trauma Informed” Troll [SSSha2], showing her abuse to various people. This was after Shannon had failed to answer about her libel and lies about me some months ago, Shannon’s Misinformation and Lies [SSSh1].
Shannon took over the role of chief flying monkey for David Hall aka Grey Area Operator, Grey Area Monarch when ex chief flying monkey StellarFox16 saw through David Hall’s abuser techniques and lies after she disagreed with his inflammatory behaviour.
Shannon is not a survivor but supposedly a “trauma informed” analyst. However she shows no signs of being ‘trauma informed’ in her behaviour. She emulates the aggressive and confrontational behaviour of her guru, the divisive David Hall. She appears proud and unrepentant about her aggression. Shannon is unquestioningly faithful to David, despite the overwhelming evidence of his gang stalking, his programming of survivors, his threats, his lying and all his other nefarious activity, Questions that David Hall Needs to Answer [SSGM65]. Quite how she justifies this to herself is uncertain.
David of course does nothing to discourage Shannon’s aggression and attacks, I believe he likes people to protect him in this aggressive manner, so that he does not have to answer for his own nefarious actions and behaviour. Here are some more examples of Shannon’s behaviour.
Shannon’s Confrontations and Abuse
Example 1 Mike Herrera https://x.com/Traveler03Truth
Mike Herrera is commenting on the UFO field and Shannon attacks him, apparently unprovoked.
Disclosure isn’t just about UFOs—it’s about truth, unity, and a future without secrecy. Imagine a world where technology, knowledge, and understanding are shared for the betterment of humanity. We deserve to know. We must demand transparency. The time is now. #UFOdisclosure #Truth
Shannon tells him to “Stop being a pussy”.
It’s difficult to see any positive benefits that this ad hominem abuse will achieve. It might get the target person’s attention but usually in a negative way, and so Shannon and David / GreyAreaMonarch will be linked in people’s minds with ad hominem abuse, insults and conflict. For more context see Appendix 1.
Example 2 Shannon Abusing Eric Hecker https://x.com/DecipheringTV
Eric was a fire fighter in Antarctica who worked for Raytheon. He now shares information about the time that he spent at the South Pole Station in Antarctica, information about Voice to Skull technology and the pushback he has encountered to his talking.
Eric was interviewed by Steven Greer. David / Grey has a long standing beef with Greer and David regularly verbally abuses him, even sending threats, on Greer’s own timeline.
David’s behaviour inflames the situation, causing his own supporters to do similar to people connected to Greer, as well as annoying Greer’s followers on Greer’s own timeline.
After Eric Hecker’s interview with Greer, Shannon takes her cue from David and attacks Eric. She parrots David’s reasons for not liking Greer. Eric points out the crux of the issue. “So your issues with Greer cause you to ignore my info. Copy that!!!”. Shannon then replies with her trademark ad hominem abuse.
Shannon uses her usual ad hominem insult, an indicator that she has lost the argument on the issues. She tells him to “go cry to Greer like the pussy ass bitch you are”.
Shannon, a newcomer to the child abuse scene, less than two years ago, out of nowhere, appears to not only have zero idea about what she is supposedly qualified in - trauma, but is utterly unable to consider things from a whistle blower’s point of view.
When you want to blow the whistle it can be a difficult job deciding who to do interviews with, as there are all sorts of considerations. What’s their reach? Who is their audience. Are they controlled opposition? This is just 3 of the considerations, there will be many more including personal ones that no-ne else will know about. A whistle blower is often in a position of disadvantage in getting important messages out to the public, for many reasons.
Shannon takes an absolutist position that because David and herself see things one way, that everyone else should abide by her view. If they do not they then run the risk of getting verbally abused by her in an ad hominem manner. Shannon gives the impression that only her and David’s view counts. She treats a primary source whistle blower with complete condescension as though he is a naughty child. She accuses him of enabling Greer, who Shannon accuses with more than a touch of hyperbole of “crimes against humanity”.
Eric will have considered the pros and cons of his interview, knows his own personal situation best, as well the information that he is talking about, and he does not deserve to be treated like this. In an imperfect world Eric made his choice. With Shannon concentrating on attacking Greer to Eric, it is deflecting away from Eric’s primary source information. Why is Shannon, herself a very limited secondary source at best, and an antagonistic one as well, deflecting from Eric’s primary source testimony?
Shannon lambasts anyone who does not do as she or David wants, and so Eric gets the abusive “pussy ass bitch” treatment. This is a variation on David’s favourite insult which is “coward bitch”. Why do this pair always go for the divisive ad hominem attacks?
Eric had even been interviewed by Emma, from the Imagination Podcast, David Hall’s wife, just 2 weeks previously, but that did not prevent Eric from getting Shannon’s “nasty treatment”.
It is not clear whether Shannon’s abuse of Eric came with endorsement or any information or approval from Emma, or whether Shannon was using her own initiative to stick the boot in. Either way it is just absurd negative nasty behaviour from the Shannon troll. For more context see Appendix 2.
3 Shannon - Listen to Survivors
Shannon shouts and rants in tweets like this fairly often. Whilst I do not disagree with the sentiment, I disagree profoundly with the methodology. If you go into the market square and rant and shout and swear then most people will avoid you at the least. They may well think you are a weirdo and make a mental note to avoid you in future, as well as avoid the people and issues that the person is ranting about.
Not many of the people who do not already know about child abuse, mind control and ritual abuse will want to get involved with a shouty sweary ranter. You may get the odd person inquiring or interacting but not many, and they will soon be put off if the ranting and attacking behaviour continues.
Discussion
Shannon’s behaviour does not appear to be useful for survivors. Many survivors steer clear of conflict due to their own PTSD. It has to be said though that some survivors also have an admiration for people standing up to the type of people that have abused them. However people like Shannon take advantage of this sentiment and abuse people on the flimsiest of evidence, if any at all, or just on the word of the proven liar, David Hall.
Shannon says that David Hall / GreyAreaMonarch “is where the truth is and always will be”. Many people have said David is a liar from their own personal experience and he de facto refuses to provide any evidence for his many false accusations, for example that myself and Veronica are “satanists”. He cannot produce any evidence because we are not and he is lying. Shannon appears totally under his spell, maybe literally.
Why does Shannon not believe ex flying money StellaFox16? She has also experienced David’s lies.
When David’s ex flying monkey StellarFox16 questioned David’s inflammatory tactics, it led to David targeting Stellar and her husband for months, as well as trying to reframe the disagreement in his favour. These are the latest posts exposing that evidence,
FMF4 Flying Monkey Fallout 4 - Absurdity Grey [SSGM59] Grey continues his framing and absurdities by attacking survivors in the name of not attacking survivors.
FMF5 Grey Area Operator - Flying Monkey Fallout 5 [SSGM64] David tries to associate Stellar with previous boogeymen he has tried to create over the years.
Even though all this abusive behaviour may be cathartic for David and Shannon, it is misplaced as not only is it likely to escalate any conflict, lead to entrenchment of positions, but also run the risk of triggering survivors.
Aggressive behaviour such as this is particularly frustrating when I personally have spend thousands upon thousands of hours, trying to get people to understand child trafficking, child abuse and mind control and ritual abuse. I understand better than 99.9 % of people, the anger and frustration that survivors feel at not being believed, and that their stories not have spread wider. I have been defending them for over 10 years, fighting alongside them, at times in front of them. I have a track record.
When people come along shouting and screaming they set back the case of survivors being heard, as well as causing division and fear. When someone comes along who says she is not a survivor and exhibits this sort of behaviour, it is puzzling to see why she does it and why she cannot see that it serves a negative purpose. When she claims to be “trauma informed” it is even more perplexing why Shannon can not see that her aggressive behaviour is counter productive to the cause of spreading information about mind control? Or does Shannon realise this, and that is her aim? It’s almost as though it is done deliberately to cause division, not only between survivors but alienating survivors from “normies” - the public. The vast majority of people have no inkling that this kind of thing is happening, and they are the people we need to persuade that it is happening.
I struggle to believe that ”Shannon” is really a trauma informed analyst and not just a shitposter, troll, chaos agent or even a sock puppet account run by AI. Does anyone know if “Shannon” is really an analyst in Florida, as her bio appears to indicate?
It is more puzzling that Shannon claims to advocate for survivors, yet attacks a ritual abuse survivor Jessie, on her bio pic. Shannon knows virtually nothing about who she is attacking apart from the propaganda that David has indoctrinated her with.
Shannon’s aggressive and abusive behaviour is counter productive if her intention is to bring good and useful attention for survivors. Why does Shannon not analyse her own behaviour?
Why does a “trauma informed” analyst cause trauma to others?
Previous Posts on Shannon
Appendix 1 Herrera https://x.com/UAPGERB/status/1905412303534915740
Appendix 2 Eric Hecker Context
Eric, you are asking me to be receptive to information about a topic being shared by a man who has caused an incredible amount of harm to his own witnesses whom he had a duty and a responsibility to protect— LIVES HAVE BEEN LOST! THIS is the problem: It has now become acceptable to promote, support, and converse with individuals who have caused irreparable, unfathomable harm to others. Crimes against humanity…CHILDREN…SURVIVORS (who were once children) FFS! It has become SO acceptable that people will openly acknowledge that they know these things about the individual (whoever that may be) while providing some lame ass justification for supporting/defending them. Of course, when these dangerous, harmful parties are never held accountable by the “justice” system for example (and by design), that naturally makes this process of thinking significantly easier…easier to dismiss and justify despite undeniable evidence to the contrary. Hence the effectiveness of plausible deniability, also by design. In an ideal world, Greer would be held accountable for his crimes and would LOSE ALL CREDIBILITY. Unfortunately, as we all know, this is not the case; we live in a society that has been built on the very foundation of corruption. Otherwise, Greer would be held accountable, Andrew Tate would’ve been arrested upon visiting the United States, Epstein would’ve been thrown in prison way back when he was initially caught, Diddy wouldn’t get three years, child pornography would not be so accessible and rampant because people would be punished by those who’s very job it is to punish them, children would not be sexualized, the most transparent and hard-working journalists would not be dead for reporting the worst crimes of humanity, survivors of crimes against humanity would be heard, validated and protected instead of used, abused, and traumatized, and Ritual Abuse Statutes certainly would never specifically provide exemption for State/Federal Research Projects. I could go on forever with this list and am well prepared to do so but, frankly, I should not have to do that. I have much more important things to do than waste my energy on an emaciated, stubborn ass horse that has been led to the food and water but refuses to eat and drink. At that point, I’m out and it’s all up to YOU. My point is simple: in a society clearly founded on corruption, those like Greer who have a SOLID reputation for committing crimes against humanity are plentiful. Therefore, it is up to US. We, as a people, have to do our part as citizens to speak up about it and refrain from enabling them irrespective of the fact that there may be some “truth” to the information they provide. Otherwise, we are just causing more harm. So, to answer your question, no, there is no reciprocity of receptivity in this context. Greer loses all credibility as a consequence of his actions. If I want to learn more about direct energy weapons, I have my own brain, a phone, a computer, and able fingers. This topic is nothing new. In fact, there are many survivors out there who you could learn from. The sheer amount of evidence GreyAreaMonarch has provided to the public is more than enough for anyone to come to a reasonable, logical conclusion as to what Dr. Greer’s motives are. Not to mention the harm that has occurred as a RESULT of them. And sure, you can say I came here to change the subject — I came here to warn you and anyone else reading this.
Any corrections, or information on David Hall aka Grey Area Monarch, Bailey and Moch mob, email scarletsagegorwss101@proton.me
foxblog3 substack [fb3]
foxblog5 current wordpress symbolism blog [fb5]
foxblog1 old wordpress, some great posts [fb1]
Posts are reposted here first Scarlet Sage Telegram Group