Bailey No Receipts 8 Steven Kelley / Craig Sawyer

Aug 31, 2025

Introduction

George Bailey boasts that he always brings receipts…

Of course, despite Bailey’s propaganda, many people know by now that he is frequently deficient in receipts, and that much of what he says is propaganda. This is another occasion that is keen to provide his opinion but not receipts.

Bailey Disses Survivor Steven Kelley

George Bailey tweeted…

“Whoever Steven Kelly is he doesn't know squat about Craig Sawyer. And importantly, Sawyer didn't became a Federal Air Marshal (FAMS) until 2002. Put it together, no he didn't hijack flight 93. How separated from reality can these people be?”

Analysis

“Whoever Steven Kelly is”… His name is Steven Kelley, with an “e”, as per the original tweet, not Kelly. Steven D. Kelley. Bailey is always very keen to point to other’s typos and imagined errors, to the point of being anal, yet he makes many of his own. Embarrassing for him. Perhaps Bailey should have looked up who Steven Kelley was before blasting him, but research is not a strength of Bailey’s, as many people realise.
“Whoever Steven Kelly is”… It does not surprise me that Bailey does not know a high profile survivor and anti child abuse campaigning figure from “Occupy the Getty”. Bailey pays little attention to those enslaved, mind controlled and ritually abused as children or those trying to help them.
“doesn’t know squat about Craig Sawyer”. The use of double negatives is discouraged, particularly in written form, as it literally means the opposite of its usually intended meaning. i.e. “doesn’t know nothing” means that he does know something. Do we have to assume that what Bailey means is that Kelley doesn’t know anything about Sawyer, or what he actually has written?
“… he doesn't know squat about Craig Sawyer”. No receipt from Bailey. Bailey had just said that he didn’t know who Steven Kelley was, so how does Bailey know that Kelley “doesn’t know squat about Craig Sawyer”?
“And importantly, Sawyer didn't became a Federal Air Marshal (FAMS) until 2002”. No receipt from Bailey, I am hoping he will provide one, since his opinion / whole argument depends on this.
“Put it together, no he didn't hijack flight 93”. Provides no receipt of the vital fact, but then Bailey then gives his unevidenced conclusion, i.e. opinion, from his unevidenced premises.
“How separated from reality can these people be?“ Bailey attacks and belittles a survivor of mind control. He really needs to provide evidence to at least try and show that this was not another of his gratuitous attacks on a survivor without any evidence or receipt. It’s particularly nasty attack as mind control involves separation of a victim’s mind into alters, and hence some separation from reality. It is, at the very least, a terrible choice of words, and it could very easily be taken to be deliberately mocking a mind control survivor. Bailey would do well to apologise, unreservedly, just from that aspect. It is nothing new from George Bailey or the people he hangs out with online, to attack a survivor though! eg. Bailey and the Moch Mob Diss Cisco, [SSBB28].

Discussion

Bailey does not produce the receipts about Craig Sawyer’s career, despite making bold statements against Steven Kelley’s statement and being very free with his accusations. Bailey is a Sawyer supporter, despite Sawyer having raised millions with his organisation VetsForChildRescue, but never rescued 1 child, despite the name of his scam.

Many people know that you can’t trust George Bailey, as he spreads disinformation and propaganda.

Bailey asked, how can you trust someone who doesn’t provide receipts?

By Bailey’s own standards, he can’t trust himself. Bailey has shown time after time that he spreads propaganda and lies.

Will Bailey produce a receipt for his unevidenced opinion about Craig Sawyer? “And importantly, Sawyer didn't became a Federal Air Marshal (FAMS) until 2002”.

Amusingly, but showing his propaganda skills, Bailey who has attacked and libelled me since April 2021, Jessie from the same date and others like Veronica not long after, frequently claims to be the one attacked. This is the behaviour of dark personalities who use a technique called reverse attribution.

They accuse others of what themselves do. Read about the people that do this here - Attributes and Tactics of Dark Personalities / Persistent Predatory Personalities,[fb32495]. How sad must a person be to try and lie like this? It’s pure propaganda. They try and fool people into reversing the reality.

Day after day, week after week, month after month Bailey libelled me and lied about me. What a sad life he must lead. I did not start to correct his lies and libels until two and half years after his frequent libels and defamation of me. He attacked me relentlessly. I was forced to correct Bailey’s lies because people threatened me, and they had believed his lies. Bailey’s lies were dangerous for me. Bailey has much to answer for but he does not seem to care.

Previous “No Receipts” Posts