George Bailey is well known for giving his opinion backed up by nothing - no link, no receipt, just gobbing off glibly. This is another example. In a transparent attempt to attack this Scarlet Sage blog, Bailey claimed that a “Sage” was one of the magic jobs.
Scarlet Sage is a herb, which I made clear from the start, posting a picture of it as the cover picture.
Yet again George “No Receipts” Bailey produces his opinion but no receipt. It’s yet more insinuation, a slur, without the receipt. That is one of his tactics.
To even try and wrangle a magical, presumably meaning magikal connection by splitting the common name for the herb Salvia coccinea into two is pretty desperate, even by Bailey’s standards, especially when a picture is provided.
Bailey and Receipts
In the past, Bailey has claimed many times that “I always bring the receipts”, [SSBBR1].
Where is the receipt for his claim that sage is a “magic job”?
Perhaps Bailey is an afficionado of role-playing games like Final Fantasy in which it is apparently mentioned as a magic job [G1].
Ladybird Book of Magic
The Bailey family is a famous satanic family The Satanic Bailey Bloodline... [SSBB23].
Perhaps George Bailey is just covering up for the Bailey family? Perhaps he has inside magikal knowledge from the satanic Bailey family? In Bailey family circles it might have a satanic meaning of which I am not aware.
However there was no intended magical or magikal meaning on my part. I chose it purely as I was growing some Scarlet Sage at the time. Bailey’s slur tactics are misplaced. Perhaps Bailey can come up with a receipt from his family’s Grimoire or magikal books? It would make a change from his usual source for esoteric knowledge - wikipedia.
Here are some previous examples for which Bailey has not been able to provide a receipt even after the lack of receipt was pointed out to him. When he claims he always produces receipts, he is clearly inverting the truth.
Where's the Receipts? George Bailey 1 - Introduction [SSBBR1]
Where's the Receipts? George Bailey 2 - Chateau des Amerois [SSBBR2]
Where's the Receipts? George Bailey 3 - Cisco Wheeler [SSBBR3]
Bailey's Great Typo Conspiracy [SSBBR4]
Index of Posts on George Bailey [SSBB20]
Appendix 1 Grok
Grok’s answers must of course not be taken to be correct, but as a guide to be checked.
[G1] Is Sage a magic job?
In the context of role-playing games like Final Fantasy or similar fantasy settings where "Sage" is a job or class, the Sage is typically a hybrid role that combines powerful magic with healing or support abilities. It’s often depicted as a master of both offensive and defensive magic, capable of wielding high-level spells in multiple disciplines, such as white magic (healing/protection) and black magic (offensive). For example:
In Final Fantasy III, the Sage is an endgame job that can use all white, black, and summoning magic, making it one of the most versatile and powerful magical classes.
In Final Fantasy XIV, the Sage is a healer job that uses a mix of restorative magic and barrier-based abilities, channeling aether through "nouliths" for both healing and minor offensive spells.
So, yes, the Sage is generally considered a "magic job" due to its reliance on spellcasting and mystical abilities, though its exact role (healer, damage dealer, or hybrid) depends on the game. If you’re referring to a specific game or setting, let me know, and I can dig deeper!
[G2] Is Sage a satanic title?
No, "Sage" is not inherently a satanic title. Here's some context to clarify:
Historical and Cultural Context: Historically, a "sage" refers to a person regarded as having profound wisdom, often in spiritual, philosophical, or cultural matters. This term spans across various cultures, including ancient Greek philosophy, where sages were wise men like Socrates or in Eastern traditions where figures like Confucius or Lao Tzu are considered sages.
Modern Usage: In contemporary language, "sage" might be used to describe someone with insightful wisdom or expertise in a particular field, often without any religious or spiritual connotation.
Esoteric and New Age Contexts: Within some New Age or esoteric circles, "sage" might be used to describe someone adept in spiritual or mystical practices, but this usage is far from being satanic. Instead, it often denotes someone who is enlightened or in tune with higher spiritual truths.
Misconceptions: The association of "sage" with satanism or anything malevolent appears to be a misunderstanding or a misrepresentation. Some critics of New Age practices or those with a very specific religious perspective might label anything outside their doctrinal boundaries as "satanic," but this is not a standard or accepted definition within the broader cultural or linguistic context.
Sage in Religion: In many religious contexts, including Christianity, Judaism, and others, the term "sage" would be more aligned with wisdom and righteousness rather than evil or satanic practices. For instance, in the Bible, figures like Solomon are known for their sagacious wisdom.
Therefore, calling someone a "sage" does not inherently imply any connection to satanism. Any claim that "sage" is a satanic title would be based on a very fringe interpretation or personal bias rather than on linguistic, cultural, or historical evidence.
Any corrections, or information on Grey Area Monarch and Moch mob email scarletsagegorwss101@proton.me
foxblog3 substack [fb3]
foxblog5 current wordpress blog [fb5]
foxblog1 old wordpress, some great posts [fb1]
Posts are posted here first Scarlet Sage Telegram Group