Sarah Moch's anti-Survivor, Hate Group 2 - Hating on Survivor Svali
Sarah Moch’s Anti-Survivor, Hate Group 2 - Hating on Survivor Svali
On Sarah Moch’s hate survivor group, AW posted a message that Gabbi Choong was soon to be interviewing Svali, an ex Jesuit mind control programmer and Illuminati whistleblower. Gabbi herself is a survivor and her podcast interviews are well respected among survivors and broader audience.
The video is placed at the end of this post for those who wish to watch Svali’s story as told to Gabbi or to check my analysis.
Moch’s anti-survivor, hate group were warming up ready to mock their next survivor target. This time group members Paula Blades and AW were most prominent. They did not watch it live but on 25th July 2023.
Paula Blades
Paula Blades has claimed that she and her sister were victim of childhood sexual abuses. She says that her baby sister was trafficked.
I have not seen her story, but she has claimed it is around, somewhere… If Paula Blades is a victim of child sexual abuse, then you may think that she would pay attention and listen sympathetically and compassionately to Svali’s story.
Think again. What you observe may well shock you, but it is typical of the group.
Paula Listening to Svali’s Story
Paula listens to Svali’s interview and starts giving a running commentary to the group on the interview as she watches the video. It is unclear why she does this, as the video is not a live premiere. She appears to do this for kicks, giggles and propaganda.
1 min
Svali had only said hello, when Paula quipped that “Svali had me at hello” and that she put her headphones on, so that her boyfriend / partner Nathan did not have to “suffer through it”.
Blades appeared to have already made her mind up before even listening to Svali’s story for the first time. Why would anyone, let alone a person who claims to be a survivor take this ignorant attitude? Why is Svali’s story not listened to with caring, compassion and understanding, with an eye to learning and being educated?
I suggest that attitude is extremely unusual for a person who claims to have suffered child sexual abuse and been silenced by paedophiles. It speaks volumes about this character and Moch’s group, which functions as an anti-survivor, hate group.
11 min
After 11 and half minutes, Blades starts mocking Svali’s story when Svali says she presented at different illuminati families.
My opinion on listening and adapting from the autotranscript is that Svali says
… we were actually hosted in our Illuminati family. That's when I first came to… I had a hosting in France, in Germany, and Russia in the US and so I first came to those families when I was three and um by then of course I, I had a lot of presentation.. [that] they called presentation programming in place, so I had programming to present in the United States, in France, in Germany and in Russia
Blades bizarrely messages to the group that Svali was a “presentation programer” [sic]
Blades shows her opinion of her interpretation of Svali’s story with an expressionless emoji and shaking emoji ("shaking caused by strong emotions such as shock, fear, confusion, disbelief, anticipation, and excitement.")
My understanding is that Svali was saying she was programmed to present, ie present at or go to live with some illuminati families. Blades appears to confuse being programmed and being a programmer, a fundamental error. It perhaps indicates Blades’s lack of understanding of mind control, programming and her lack of interest in the subject. This is surprising as Blades is a prominent member of the group dedicated to bashing a bloodline ritual abuse survivor. Being a programmer at age 3 is obviously vastly different from being programmed to present to a family by aged 3.
Why does any compassionate person, never mind Blades who says she suffered child sexual abuse, not even think to express horror and sympathy for a child of 3 receiving trauma based mind control programming, especially when her rather creepy bio pic claims “Paula Loves Children”?
Blades claims that she was “silenced as a child, by pedophiles” yet she is not even listening properly or with sympathy and compassion to someone with the most horrible childhood, in fact Blades is effectively silencing Svali’s voice by mocking it.
AW, one of the more prominent members of the anti-survivor, hate group, reacts to Blades’s incorrect summary with a gif pulling faces.
The group love their gifs and memes which they use to mock and bully victims and survivors. They appear to have callous disregard of anyone’s feelings except their own.
13 min
Blades posts a transcript of Gabbi recapping what Svali had said at 13.52 and comments “Oh Boy”.
Gabbi was recapping that as a 3 or 4 year old, Svali was presenting in different countries and then Svali explained that the reason behind the placement was to understand the culture, and to have a cover story. Also one purpose she said was to infiltrate the families. The bloodline families do raise children, they are not brought up in a facility like many others - presumably expendables and some others. In my understanding the children are often swapped between different families.
The infiltration of the family occurs as the programmed child will have alters, whose job it is to record and report on those around them. The alters have amnesic barriers between them, presumably only one way for recording alters who will be co-conscious with others. A particular alter does not know that another alter is recording and then reporting everything.
The recorder alter also works against the host whose alter it is. It is recording the child with photographic memory, downloadable by the programmer. If any alter was to rebel on an issue, the programmer will know through the recording / reporting alters and be able to step on that behaviour. This is reinforced by programmes such as “nowhere to hide” programming. The families, would not expect a small child to be reporting on them, and besides they are also under mind control.
So Gabbi makes the situation about “presenting” clear but Blades does not correct her previous incorrect statement that Svali is a programmer aged 3. Blades either cannot understand it or she is deliberately misrepresenting it.
Paula Blades then posts a farting gif to indicate what she thought of that.
To that Meredith, AW and Tutti&Frutti post ROFL (roll on the floor laughing) emojis. The whole idea of child abuse and mind control torture appears to be funny to them. It’s very odd for people to mock child abuse, its not normal. Are these people Meredith, Paula Blades, AW and Tutti&Frutti normal?
21 min
Blades then commented “She wrote this shit over 20 years ago” making clear her opinion. Svali’s has written many posts, since she left the illuminati, and at the end of this post there is a list of articles I have written on her and a list of the websites where her articles may be found.
23 min
Blades then comments about 2030 Agenda, the antichrist, and mentions at 27 mins that the interviewer Gabbi is also a programming victim and was demonically possessed. Blades specifically picks this fact out.
29 min
Blades then posts some screenshots without comment about demons…
30 min
…and demonic programming
33 min
Blades excitedly informed John about the mention of dimensions. The group appear totally unbelieving about spiritual portals and indeed anything they cannot understand. Since they rarely read around the subject of mind control programming, ritual abuse, survivors or esoteric organisations, then the group have little to no understanding of how to put what any survivor says into context with what other survivors say. Hence they cannot work out or analyse the significance of what is said. Much sounds fantastical and way out of most peoples experience, but when you have many survivors saying the same things, then the jigsaw picture becomes clearer.
Blades, with her comment about dimensions was trying to invoke one of the groups’ mocking rituals and was prompting John to reply with his portal gif.
If John had been online he would have posted this, his signature gif for mocking people who talk about portals and dimensions.
34 min
Blades highlights a part of the transcript with one of her trademark red boxes, which often bear little relevance to the overall point she makes - but it looks authoritative. This red box is no exception, which says from autotranscription “[those] poor girls usually don’t last very long, they usually only last a year because it’s such a.. or two”
Somehow from this red box, Blades exclaims “one year old oracles!!!!”
Again Blades is wrong. Svali did not say or mean one year old oracles at all. She talked about one type of oracle in Rome, where there are nine oracles chained to pillars and when anyone comes into the area they start prophesying, crying and screaming. An oracle, when placed in a position like this Svali says only survives for a year or two. Svali is quite clear, there is no talk of an oracle being one year old. They only last a year or two after taking their position in Rome and being chained to the pillars.
Blades chooses to not comment on the oracles being blinded, chained and tortured. Blades just tries to ridicule Svali. Very, very odd, but in this anti-survivor, hate group, this is the norm.
The more that Blades misrepresents what Svali actually described the more likely it seems that Blades is deliberately misrepresenting the truth and deliberately disseminating propaganda. She appears to be guiding the group to be biased into thinking that Svali is talking nonsense and that the group should ridicule and mock Svali, and not research into Svali.
35 min
Blades now comments “But she lasted to age 19 as an oracle”, (rofl emoji, crying laughing emoji and clown emoji)”
Blades yet again misrepresents what was said. Blades is giving the impression that Svali was making herself out to be extraordinary as she lasted until she was 19 as an oracle. However Svali had clearly stated that she was an oracle for a year when she was 19. She also stated that she was a different type of oracle, one for a family in the illuminati. There were some risks of being killed but the conditions were nowhere near as arduous or sadistic as those at Rome. It is very different.
Svali went on to become pretty much top Jesuit mind control programmer, and these top jobs appear to be chosen early on. My impression is that the people destined to be high fliers, are put in a variety of other jobs so that they gather a range of experiences, before doing their main role or destiny chosen for them. Top people afaik, chosen for their spiritual gifts, which essentially means being able to hear or maybe converse with various demons, are not meant to be killed or stick in a lesser role - so Svali would not have been put in an oracles job from early on.
Blades has the audacity to twist what Svali said, to lie and spread disinformation and then proclaim “I can’t believe I’m still listening to this crap”. It all seems to add up to an elaborate act from Paula Blades.
If AW told the truth that she was going to listen as well then she must have found out that Blades was lying about these issues. AW chose to say nothing, but play along with the Blades charade.
39 min
Paula expresses her disdain… “Inter dimensional Assassins . And JizCze chose to plagiarize this?! SMDH” (emojis)
SMDH is Shaking My Damn Head.
Jiz [male ejaculate] is one of the groups’ favourite nicknames for Jessie Czebotar, with JizCze, Jizz, Jizzie, Jizzy being variations. This is apparently hilarious to the group, despite most if not all claim to be Christian. I am not sure how they reconcile this. Mockery and ad hominem comments and insults are thrown around liberally, much more than facts.
Jessie did not plagiarise Svali about the 12 year old ceremony. That is another Moch group myth perpetuated by the lies of Paula Blades. Blades has already been informed of this by myself but chooses to ignore the facts and spread her lies.
41 min
Meredith chirps in "I’m liking the Paula cliffs notes version”.
The group appears to like anything that perpetuates their myths and lies and mocks satanic ritual abuse victims.
“Oh, shapeshifters turning into birds … I wonder if these are Jizzie's spy birds” (Various laughing emojis and AW posts a ghost emoji.
Blades cannot help herself. The groups’ anti Jessie, anti survivor theories are chameleon like, but it can be summed up that they accuse Jessie of making everything up, and everything is a fraud. The very few times they look at a survivor’s testimony and find something that could corroborate Jessie’s story, then they accuse Jessie of plagiarising it.
Blades and AW in this exchange, which is not part of the current discussion, espouse that everything Jessie says has been plagiarised.
They constantly twist facts and leave out parts, to fit their theories. Never do they even consider that something Svali said could be true and then it could corroborate what Jessie has said. Because it is similar to Jessie’s story, then it must be mocked and discredited. It appears that Blades thinks she can spot an opportunity to try to blame Jessie for copying a Svali story.
The group just cannot seem to accept anything outside of their own limited experience and limited knowledge. They mock Svali talking about shapeshifters, something many survivors of the system talk about. As for birds, off the top of my head perhaps they should read Carlos Castenada or Don Juan, but I am sure there are many more.
Meredith pipes up Typing Hawks? Blades responds with flame emoji.
Paula C Blades - “this is hilarious” (Various laughing emojis). Thank-you Savli [sic] for sharing your incredible work (some dodgy face emoji).
47 min
Blades then types “Folly speaks? Freudian slip?” laughing emojis
A Freudian slip on whose part? “Folly speaks” is from the machine transcription, known to not be 100% accurate. Anyone who follows auto transcripts knows not to trust them completely, especially on names, and its often easy to work out what they mean when reading a transcript. I read the transcript and immediately knew it was likely that the word “folly” which sounds similar to the subject of the video ie Svali was a machine listening / transcription error for Svali. This is even more certain, especially if you know that Svali’s first website was called Svali Speaks.
Wikipedia definition of Freudian slip
It could not possibly be an unconscious subdued wish manifesting itself from a machine translation. Besides, Blades had also stated that she was listening through headphones, so as well as having the benefit of the accompanying auto transcript, she should know well what was actually said. She knew it was not any kind of Freudian slip, but chose to act like it was.
The very least one assumption would be that Blades is incredibly sloppy reading and listening to information and then relays it many times incorrectly. However Blades is not stupid. The pattern of “mistakes” appears to point to Blades deliberate disinformation and producing propaganda to fool the even less informed members of the group. She appears to be deliberately misleading the group that she knows will not check, as well as any readers of the public group.
I will never get this hour back”, Blades exclaims, to rofl emojis from the group’s clapping seals - Meredith, AW and T.
Blades has managed to find time to search for a link / pic of a meme of 5 clones to further mock Svali.
No low too is low for Sarah Moch’s anti-survivor, hate group.
Blades jokes about the clones Svali describes but this is just another example of the group being totally ignorant of other survivor stories that mention clones. Survivor Sue Esther Ford, a sister of Sue Ford aka Brice Taylor recently mentioned more than one twin sister [10]. I have been told it said that Sue Esther Ford was a clone made from the same split egg as Sue Ford and there was a third clone of them as well. Other survivors have mentioned various types of clones, and it is perfectly scientifically possible, despite Blades mockery.
Meredith thanks Blades with a Thank You For Taking One for the Team meme and words -“We thank you for your sacrifice”. The word “sacrifice” appears to be an ill chosen choice of words.
Blades replies “Holy Literal Crap” with poop emoji.
Meredith replies “The things we do for intel”.
This gives the readers, unfamiliar with this hate group, some idea of what the group thinks is intelligence! They regard misinformation, disinformation, twisting, mischaracterising, mocking, ridiculing and propaganda as “intel”. This is how they do their self vaunted “research” that they boast about so frequently.
Paula then goes off to spend time with her man! Good luck to him.
Blades shares a clip of satirical Onion’s Disney Geneticists Debut New Child Stars, presumably likening Svali’s child abuse testimony to satire.
Paula C Blades
Blades Factual Errors
Presentation programmer
One year old Oracles
Svali lasted until 19 as an oracle
Freudian slip
Jessie plagiarised Svali
Blades Mocking / highlighting
“Had me at Hello”
“Oh boy”
farting gif
“wrote this shit”
demonic programming
dimensions
interdimensional assassins
jizz
shapeshifters turning into birds
“this is hilarious”
“I can’t believe I’m still listening to this crap”.
“never get this hour back”
cloning meme
Meredith and AW were supportive to Blades mockery all the way through. If AW watched it like she said, then she knew Blades was lying and propagandising on at least 4 occasions. Why did AW not tell the truth?
Sarah Moch owner / moderator of the group, does not moderate this anti-survivor hate. She does not appear in this example, but it’s her group and she is responsible for moderating its content. It is still available for viewing in the public group.
Conclusions
Many might have thought I was using hyperbole when calling Sarah Moch’s group an anti-survivor, hate group. What do you think now? I have provided two examples so far and there is no doubt.
Survivor Svali is willfully misrepresented by Blades and if you listen or even follow the transcript, then these are not even easy errors to make. Blades probably of all in the group, knows more than the others about a very limited number of some survivors stories. Blades errors were too blatant to be accidental and combined with her mockery from the word “hello” this fits a pattern, to quite deliberately mislead the group. She twisted key parts of Svali’s story and pretended they were nonsensical. The rest was mocked.
The mockery from Blades starts at the first minute and lasts to the end. The others join in. Why?
The manner of these exchanges are typical of the group, they at best misread, mishear and mistake the facts, twist the facts and come up with absurd conclusions. They ridicule survivors personal stories, and survivors advocates and mock them mercilessly with memes and gifs. The three most active in the group in “researching” appear to be Moch, Blades and AW who have all been covered in these first two posts of this series.
If the group actually wanted to discredit Jessie then they are doing a terrible job. 5% of what they have to say maybe worth investigating as anomalies or discrepancies but all that is covered and lost with a morass of lies, disinformation, misinformation and propaganda. It is no wonder so few people take them seriously, which just infuriates them more. They have little to no wider experience of survivors stories, ritual abuse, mind control, programming, and when they actually do read them or listen as in this example, they attack and mock them as shown in the first post and this one.
Perhaps the most worrying comment was when Meredith commented “the things we do for intel” .
Does it remotely look to anyone, that Blades or the group have researched fairly and accurately or properly analysed the raw material? They cannot even repeat the raw material when listening to it. This was about as far from “intel” as it is possible to get. It is more “lie tel”. Corrupting the original material, mocking it and not placing it in the context of other survivors stories, and any analysis is drivel.
What is the most sinister about this debacle of Blades “listening” and commenting on Svali is that Blades appears to quite deliberately mislead others in the group and to give disinformation about Svali, and reinforce this by mocking her. It’s pure propaganda. The group know even less than Paula Blades. Her actions appear designed to make sure that the group not believe Svali. The group even lie to each other, bizarre. It will make the group less likely to watch Gabbi Choong’s videos, yet Gabbi Choong is an excellent source and interviewer. Did Blades insert herself into the group to deliberately mislead it?
What is disturbing as well is that some people actually take notice of this hate group’s “research” and repost it, even quote it, and use it as a basis for their opinions. How sad. Some seem to think the group is good at research! You have had an inside peek at the Moch’s survivor hate groups’ research. Would you trust Paula Blades’s research on anything else, when something so easy to do as listening is mutilated by Blades into Svali hate? Would you trust this groups’ research and “intel” on anything? Do the group know that Blades’s is misrepresenting and corrupting what Svali really said? They certainly should not trust her, they can and should check my research for themselves.
Why has Sarah Moch not admonished Blades for her obvious scornful, mocking and derisive tone towards a survivor? Why is this still all viewable on a public group? It’s disgraceful. Simply Sarah Moch does not care. She appears not to have the capacity to read and digest their stories. She is content to let survivors be misrepresented, mocked and hated in her group.
This is Svali’s interview with Gabbi, that Blades and Moch’s anti-survivor, hate group were mocking, for those that want to listen, and to check my analysis.
2023 Jul Rumble Gabbi Choong Svali on the Illuminati, Jesuit power structure, demonics used in mind control & 'gifts' [12r]
This interview and another more recent Svali interview by Gabbi on child trafficking are on this post of mine - Svali Interviews with Gabbi Choong [11]
Meanwhile Paula and the group mock others for their limited analytical thinking abilities, instead of looking closer to home, to themselves. They are the very thing they hate.
The group has lies, disinformation, ad hominem attacks and insults, mocking, memes and misinformation and lacks truth and integrity. Yet again it is proven to be an anti-survivor, hate group.
Quick Update 2024 Jan 13. I was criticised for not making it clear which group was the survivor hate group! Apologies, a quick read of other posts would it have made it abundantly clear as the whole blog is about telling the truth about the Moch mobs group. It is Sarah Moch’s Group and click on this picture link will take you to the mocking of Svali section.
Previous Posts on Svali
Svali, Illuminati Structure and Mind Control [Sv1w]
Svali Speaks - Interview with Emma [Sv2w]
Svali Speaks [Sv2s]
Jesuit 12 Year Old Child Ritual [5]
Svali The Suite 101 Articles Index [4]
Svali’s blogs and websites
2023 Jun 26 Svali The Suite 101 Articles Index [4]
2008 Oct Svali Speaks website/blog [6]
2018 - present Svali Speaks Again website/blog [7]
Previous Posts on Moch’s anti-urvivor, Hate Group
Scarlet Sage Sarah Moch's anti Survivor Hate Group [SSASH1]
Sarah Moch Part 1 – Spiteful, Yes Spiteful! [SSSM1]
Sarah Moch 2 – Toxic Ostrich [SSSM2]
Sarah Moch 3 - Sarah's Antichrist Election Idiocy [SSSM3]
Sarah Moch's Stalk and Snitch 1 - Is it Safe or Effective? [SSSS1]
George B. Bailey Part 1 [SSBB1]
George B Bailey 2 Tags and Tantrums [SSBB2]
If there is anything to correct please email scarletsagegorwss@tutanota.com
Links
[Sv1w] 2020 Apr 25 cathyfoxblog Svali, Illuminati Structure and Mind Control https://cathyfox.wordpress.com/2020/04/25/svali-illuminati-structure-and-mind-control/
[Sv2w] 2022 Feb 23 wordpress foxblog1 Svali Speaks - Interview with Emma https://cathyfox.wordpress.com/2022/02/23/svali-interview/
[Sv2s] 2022 Feb 23 substack foxyfoxblog Svali Speaks
[SSASH1] 2023 Nov 8 substack Scarlet Sage Sarah Moch's anti-Survivor, Hate Group Part 1 https://scarletsage.substack.com/p/sarah-mochs-anti-survivor-hate-group #sarahmoch #moch #meangirls #jessieczebotar #survivorhate
[4] 2023 Jun 26 FoxyFoxblog Svali The Suite 101 Articles Index https://foxyfox.substack.com/p/svali-the-suite-101-articles-index #svali #suite101 #mkultra #mindcontrol #programming #healing #illuminati #index
[5] 2023 Feb 2 substack FoxyFox Jesuit 12 Year Old Child Ritual https://foxyfox.substack.com/p/jesuit-12-year-old-ritual #jesuits #sra #ritualabuse #csa #svali
[6] 2008 Oct Svali Speaks https://svalispeaks.wordpress.com/
[7] 2018 - present Svali Speaks Again https://svalispeaksagain.wordpress.com/
[8] Blades I gotta watch this https://t.me/jessieczebotarchat/58645
[9] Presentation Programmers https://t.me/jessieczebotarchat/58652
[10] Sue Ford (Esther) and Dan Duval Part 1 Thanks for the Memories, Twins, and Hidden Ones https://danduval.com/sue-ford-esther-and-dan-duval-part-1-thanks-for-the-memories-twins-and-hidden-ones/
[11] 2023 Oct 28 substack foxyfox Svali Interviews with Gabbi Choong https://foxyfox.substack.com/p/svali-interviews-with-gabbi-choong #svali #childtrafficking #illuminati #sra #gabbichoong
[12r] 2023 Jul Rumble Gabbi Choong Svali on the Illuminati, Jesuit power structure, demonics used in mind control & 'gifts' https://rumble.com/v32toac-svali-on-the-illuminati-jesuit-power-structure-demonics-used-in-mind-contro.html
[13] Rumble Gabbi Choong https://rumble.com/c/c-2098992
[14] Jessie Czebotar Chathttps://t.me/jessieczebotarchat/58654
2023 Oct 15 [SSSM1] 2023 Oct 15 Scarlet Sage Sarah Moch Part 1 – Spiteful, Yes Spiteful! https://scarletsage.substack.com/p/sarah-moch-part-1-spiteful-yes-spiteful #sarahmoch #spiteful #liar
2023 Oct 22 [SSSM2] 2023 Oct 22 substack Scarlet Sage Sarah Moch 2 – Toxic Ostrich https://scarletsage.substack.com/p/sarah-moch-2-toxic-ostrich #sarahmoch #toxicostrich #liar #harasser
2023 Oct 29 [SSGAM1] 2023 Oct 29 wordpress foxblog2 Satanic Harassment Symbolism - Full of Bull https://cathyfoxblog2.wordpress.com/2023/10/29/satanic-harassment-symbolism-full-of-bull/ #symbolism #satanicharassment #satanicsymbolism #satanism
2023 Nov 8 [SSASH1] 2023 Nov 8 substack Scarlet Sage Sarah Moch's anti Survivor Hate Group Part 1 https://scarletsage.substack.com/p/sarah-mochs-anti-survivor-hate-group #sarahmoch #moch #meangirls #jessieczebotar #survivorhate
2023 Nov 11 [SSSS1] 2023 Nov 11 substack Scarlet Sage Sarah Moch's Stalk and Snitch 1 - Is it Safe or Effective? https://scarletsage.substack.com/p/sarah-mochs-stalk-and-snitch-1-is #scarletsage #sarahmoch #moch #jessieczebotar #mindcontrol #StalkandSnitch
2023 Nov 12 [SSBB1] 2023 Nov 12 substack Scarlet Sage George B. Bailey Part 1 https://scarletsage.substack.com/p/george-b-bailey-part-1 #libel #lies #GeorgeBBailey #GeorgeBailey #Bullshit
2023 Nov 17 [SSSM3] 2023 Nov 17 Scarlet Sage Sarah Moch 3 - Sarah's Antichrist Election Idiocy https://scarletsage.substack.com/p/sarah-moch-3-sarahs-antichrist-election #sarahmoch #idiocy #antichrist #antichristelection #election
2023 Nov 18 [SSBB2] 2023 Nov 18 Scarlet Sage George B Bailey 2 Tags and Tantrums https://scarletsage.substack.com/p/george-b-bailey-2-tags-and-tantrums #tags #tantrums #attacks #bullshit #bullshitbailey #georgebailey
2023 Nov 19 [SSASH2] 2023 Nov 19 substack Scarlet Sage Sarah Moch’s Anti Survivor Hate Group 2 - Hating on Survivor Svali https://scarletsage.substack.com/p/sarah-mochs-anti-survivor-hate-group-5a7 #sarahmoch #paulablades #survivorhate #svali #antisurvivor #gabbichoong