Shannon The "Trauma Informed" Troll

Introduction

Shannon apparently feels it is her right to abuse other people, including myself. I did warn her many months ago that she should provide evidence for her false accusations, Shannon’s Misinformation and Lies [SSSh1]. However she did not bother to justify her lies, defamation and libels. She has had more than enough time to reflect and correct, but has chosen to double down and has continued her attacks. Shannon, as with all the rest of the people featured on this blog, chose to attack me with lies and so now it it is her turn to have the spotlight of truth shone upon her and her foul mouthed and abusive behaviour.

Shannon The “Trauma Informed Behaviour Analyst” Troll

There are many abusers and trolls around, but not many that are willing to abuse people with so little justification or evidence or one who claims to be a Board Certified Behaviour Analyst who works with children and adolescents.

Shannon says that she not only works with children and adolescents but those who are diagnosed with developmental disabilities, and/or behavioural disorders. She claims to use Trauma Informed Applied Behaviour Analysis. She claims that she supports and advocates for mind control survivors yet her behaviour on twitter is almost guaranteed to cause trauma to the victims of her attacks. How Shannon reconciles her behaviour with what she says that she is qualified in, is for her to answer. I do not believe there is any justification for her behaviour.

Shannon - Flying Monkey for Grey Area Operator

Shannon attacked me entirely unprovoked, but then it was not a surprise to find that she was associated with Grey Area Operator, a notorious predator and liar. Shannon acts as a flying monkey to Grey Area Operator, and appears to take whatever he says as true, and is quite prepared to attack others based on his lies, falsehoods and propaganda. That is exactly the ideal sort of person / puppet for Grey Operator to take advantage of. Shannon then emulates the worst of Grey Operator’s behaviour - attacking and abusing people often with no legitimate reason other than her apparent need to have a scapegoat for her own deficiencies.

These are just a few examples of Shannon’s abusive behaviour. They are not cherry picked, this behaviour of hers is routine and there are many more examples.

Example 1 Abuse of Whitney Webb and GlonnyPin__Gosch

Whitney Webb is one of the best researchers and most articulate speakers about what is happening in the world and the hidden agendas behind them. She and GlonnyPin__Gosch made a deep dive series on Epstein and Diddy, something most people would be grateful for and keen to listen to. It is not clear whether Shannon actually listened to the programme or not, but she launched her unprovoked attack on Whitney and GlonnyPin__Gosch.

Shannon chose to attack them, telling them they were “a piece of shit”, if they did not listen to the Grey Area Operator. Then she accused them of sharing child trafficking research as entertainment and gatekeeping.

“If you cared about solving the problem you’d get with GreyAreaMonarch and OS. Otherwise you’re a piece of shit sharing child trafficking “research” for entertainment and, ofc, gatekeeping. P E R I O D”.

To believe that there is only one way of tackling an issue or even only one person who can do that is arrogant and absurd. To assert this in public demonstrates the limitations of the person proclaiming this. To then abuse people who do not do as you think they should is beyond belief. Even if someone was aware of Grey Area Operator, they are likely to see his continual provocations and arguments, and they would see his and his supporters continual aggression. That is likely to put most people off. If they search deeper then there is a mountain of evidence showing that Grey Operator is a perpetrator, beyond doubt. Does Shannon really think that her method of attacking Whitney and co writer is likely to bring about their cooperation with her and Grey Area Operator?

I do not agree with the accusation that Whitney or Klonny are making their series with the motivation being “entertainment”. Obviously the listener’s / reader’s interest needs to be maintained if information is to succeed in reaching people, that goes without saying. It was also desperate for Shannon to try to diminish the research by putting it in inverted commas as “research”, when Whitney is renowned for her uncovering and connecting dots that no-one else has.

I am open to peoples ideas about who is “gatekeeping” but if allegations are made then proof should be provided, otherwise it is destructive and divisive. If proof is not provided then the accusers like Shannon rightly face the charges that the division and fear is their goal. It is no coincidence that Shannon is making unevidenced accusations, as this is exactly what her mentor / guru Grey Area Operator does. He uses it as a tactic of control and manipulation. Shannon acts as a flying monkey for him, and unfortunately she replicates his destructive and divisive behaviour. If Shannon turned her critical eye onto Grey Area Operator about whom there is abundant evidence, then she may benefit. Even if Shannon thinks Whitney is a gatekeeper, then is using ad hominem abuse really the best way to proceed?

Example 2 Abuse and Bullying of Lauren Rose

In this example, Lauren Rose Roseysunlotus had already been unfairly attacked by one survivor for asking what RAMCOA [RItual Abuse Mind Control Organised Abuse] stood for, an abbreviation not widely known outside certain ritual abuse circles, and she was criticised for doing yoga. Shannon dived in with her bullying on top of that.

Lauren made very valid points that people who had suffered much trauma, as she had, were more able to believe mind control stories and be more able to deal with the content. She also said that she had researched and was informed about mind control, but that people healing themselves was a prerequisite for helping to implement change on a mass scale. Lauren was healing herself.

Shannon mocked Lauren and asks her whether she wants a medal ”for doing a lot of research”. Shannon then told Lauren that “This research bullshit has GOT to stop”. An utterly bizarre unprovoked attack by Shannon.

Did Lauren deserve this? Is this how Shannon’s trauma informed behaviour analysis works? Lauren’s analysis on healing is intelligent and a view that many hold. Doing work on healing yourself is a sensible prerequisite to being able to help others.

Lauren has made clear that she had suffered much trauma and was taking steps to heal herself from that trauma. Shannon, despite boasting about being qualified as “trauma informed” chose nevertheless to attack Lauren.

The obviously damaged Shannon lectures others on how they should behave but demonstrably behaves appallingly. Complete intolerance of others, pushing her own view onto others and bullying. This is about as far removed from “trauma informed” behaviour as possible.

Recognising that working on yourself to heal is key for survivors before they try to help others. It can be very destructive both for trauma survivor and many others if an unhealed individual seeks to help others, as perhaps aptly demonstrated by the abusive and destructive behaviour shown by Shannon and Grey Operator.

Example 3 Ad Hominem abuse of Lin Kraft

Grey Area Operator swore to some intel “This is the intel, I swear to it”, and he said that a false flag was going to happen on a particular UAP (Unidentified Aerial Phenomena) event. Grey Operator was his usual arrogant and condescending self, giving the impression that only he knows best and that everyone else knows nothing.

Grey Operator is of course renowned for his attacks on others, negativity and fearmongering, which obviously cause much division. Lin Kraft had seemingly noticed Grey Operator’s attitude and commented that Grey Area’s negativity should be balanced with some positivity otherwise he would just be seen as a whiner.

Shannon, acting as Grey Area Operator’s flying monkey then attacked Lin Kraft with ad hominem abuse for wanting some positivity.

Shannon’s gem of negativity was “…you’re just a pussy ass little bitch who’d rather get fat on spoon fed “positive” bullshit”.

It is difficult to see how Shannon thought that her comment might help anything. The person that uses ad hominem abuse is usually the one that cannot deal with the content of the arguments put forward. “Pussy ass little bitch” appears to be Shannon’s favourite phrase of abuse which she uses often, perhaps indicating her limited ability to interact constructively. It is also again difficult to see how this fits in with her supposed “trauma informed” behaviour, as this would be almost guaranteed to cause trauma and distress and is not constructive whatsoever.

Despite Grey Area Operator’s condescension and know it all attitude, the false flag that he predicted did not materialise. Obviously Grey Operator’s intel comes into question, as does his judgement, as does what his true intention was in spreading this false intel. Was it just to spread more fear and division that he is notorious for doing? As far as I know, Grey Operator has never apologised for this duff intel / propaganda. He never holds himself accountable for anything, but tries to hold everyone else accountable for the slightest perceived indiscretion. This is a typical trait of a narcissist.

Example 4 FractalAnte gets Abuse from Shannon

Shannon shouts more abuse, hypocritically opposite to her previous abuse and opinions about research.

“OPEN A FUCKING BOOK DUMBASS why don’t you do something instead of BITCH AT BULLSHIT THAT’S NOT YOUR PARTICULAR WAY. Blocked.”

Contrary to Shannon’s previous attacks that suggested research was not good, this time she shouts at someone to “Open a fucking book dumbass”. Shannon lectures or shouts at someone that he should not “bitch at bullshit that’s not your particular way”. It looked to be constructive advice from FractalAnte, but Shannon frames it as them wanting things done their particular way. This is all the more remarkable as Shannon insists that everything should be done her way, which is whatever Grey Area Operator says. Grey Operator appears to have an unnatural hold and influence over Shannon.

Discussion

These are not cherry picked examples, and in many ways these are not the best examples of Shannon’s continual attacks and abuse on others. There are many more examples.

Shannon claims to be a board certified behaviour analyst. I am skeptical that she is in employment, as just from these examples then she does not display the right temperament to be dealing with children, nor to be in the field of “trauma informed” analysis or treatment. She cannot control her anger or what should be said to whom and when. Shannon seems to scapegoat people so that she feels better. If she does have children in her “care” those children might well be at risk, judging by her behaviour on social media.

Shannon very much emulates Grey Area Operator. Grey Operator is the most divisive person in the survivor movement, portraying himself as a hero whistle blower but in reality a vile and vicious perpetrator surrounded by enablers. Shannon appears to have latched onto Grey Operator and treats him as a guru, who can say and do no wrong. Shannon is effectively controlled by him.

Shannon acts as Grey Area Operator’s flying monkey, chief flying monkey. She does not seem to question anything he says. It might be beneficial if Shannon had a serious talk with StellarFox16 who used to be Grey Operator’s chief flying monkey but rejected him earlier this year. Stellar learned, as others of us have, that Grey Operator uses abuser language, that he unjustifiably attacks others with false accusations labelling everyone “satanists” and “mind controlled” and he lies prolifically.

Stellar also said, in reference to the TI type harassment operations that Grey Operator used to carry out, that she does not ”trust network assets that helped terrorize survivors and facilitate events to re-traumatize them because they “had a come to jesus” moment”. Stellar further stated that Grey Operator “acts like a handler for the occult he claims to have left”. Stellar knew Grey Operator aka David Hall much better than Shannon does and Stellar has experienced mind control and ritual abuse, Shannon has never mentioned that she is a survivor.

People might think, having seen some of Shannon’s verbal abuse that she had the knowledge to back it up or was some sort of expert on what she shouts about. No. She only found out about mind control and ritual abuse less than 2 years ago, but yet she feels that she can lambast all and sundry with her view of what people should and should not be doing, which is overwhelmingly based on what Grey Operator says. Shannon does not seem able to cope with knowledge of child abuse without attacking others as an emotional escape valve. This is an indicator that she is not healed herself from whatever trauma that she has suffered.

Shannon occasionally shuts down her twitter account when things get too much for her, and she feels guilt that she is failing to stand up for survivors. However with her destructive attitude, then it would be far better if she stepped aside from social media to heal herself, She is actually doing a great deal of damage to survivors, scaring people away from investigating the subject of mind control with her aggressive attitude.

I suspect that when Shannon spoke up about child abuse, she gained some sort of friendship group and encouragement that she was lacking previously, She has invested much emotional energy into the fact that Grey Operator was how he portrayed himself, as a hero whistle blower and she came to believe that he could do no wrong. It would be painful to herself to admit that Grey Operator is a liar, an abuser and a perpetrator, and she meets the psychological wall of “betrayal blindness” as Lena describes it.

It’s a shame that I even had to start writing this series on Shannon. It is a shame that she de facto refused to supply evidence of her lies about me. Unfortunately I have learned from experience that being silent for too long in the face of lies, means that they are allowed to spread, and they have resulted in threats against me. Hence now I give people as much leeway as possible, in Shannon’s case over a year, but now will be holding Shannon to account for her lies and behaviour. She should have heeded the warnings.

I have been writing about child abuse, mind control, ritual abuse and symbolism for over 12 years. The way I choose to do it, is to research and then write my research in as succinct way as possible, and then it is up to others to take it or leave it, spread it as they see fit. Many people have benefitted from my articles and been awakened as to what is happening. I have, with many others, helped create the conditions for the many more survivors coming forward in the last few years, then pushed forward immeasurably by 50 Voices of Ritual Abuse, see Index [1]

People such as Grey Area Operator causing and spreading fear and division, have abused the atmosphere that others have built up, that enabled them to tell their stories. Unfortunately people like Shannon have emulated Grey Area Operator’s worst parts - the aggression, the attacks, the abuse that cause that very division, cause the fear and fragment survivors and advocates even more.

It is perfectly predictable that Shannon’s aggression, the attacks, the abuse, persistent foul language is not going to be conducive to improving the lot of survivors or get people to listen to survivor’s testimony. Why can Shannon not see this? Any intelligent person would realise that people will mirror her aggression back, or just avoid her and survivors. The fact that she keeps on with the same behaviour appears to indicate that division is her intention. If it is not, then she really should take a long break from social media and heal herself. Shannon heal thyself.

Shannon should ask…

• Why did Grey Operator have so many sock puppets and use them to gang stalk survivors and others?

• Why did Grey Operator trigger and programme at least 2 survivors? Just about the lowest thing he could do - be a perpetrator on other survivors, whilst claiming to speak for and campaign for survivors.

• Why does Grey Operator keep making false allegations with zero evidence and false evidence? Why is he not producing the evidence or apologising?

• Why Is Grey Operator not transparent about who sees data given to Organize Safety? Who else is involved? What kind of entity is Organize Safety? How can people tell that it is not luciferian controlled? Are ISSTD involved?

• When is Grey Area Operator going to address and apologise for all his nefarious behaviour?

Previous Shannon and Grey Operator Links

• Shannon’s Misinformation and Lies [SSSh1]

• Summary on Agent Grey Area Operator David Hall [SSGM53] https://scarletsage.substack.com/p/70-solstice-summary-on-agent-grey

Links

[1] foxblog2 50 Voices of Ritual Abuse Index https://cathyfoxblog2.wordpress.com/2024/02/11/50-voices-of-ritual-abuse-28-index/ #50voices #50voicesofritualabuse #index #ritualabuse

Appendix 1 Contexts

Example 1 Context

Example 2 Context

Example 3 Context

Example 4 Context

Appendix 2 Shannon Twitter Bio

Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA) who works with children and adolescents diagnosed with developmental disabilities and/or emotional and behavioral disorders; Trauma Informed Applied Behavior Analysis.

My Purpose:

• 1) to advocate on behalf of the millions of children and adults who have been exploited, abused, sex trafficked, subjected to mind control and/or torture conditioning via behavior modification techniques, SRA, DEWs, etc. #organizesafety

• 2) to support and advocate on behalf of survivors who have experienced any of the above

• 3) to increase public awareness of these inhumanities via thorough research and dissemination

• 4) to connect with others who are passionate about preventing such inhumane acts from occurring in the future

• *Disclaimer: Posts are not affiliated with the BACB® and all statements are solely based on the poster’s opinion.

Appendix 3 - Grok What is Trauma-Informed Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA)?

Trauma-informed Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA) is an adapted approach to traditional ABA that integrates principles of trauma-informed care (TIC) to ensure interventions are sensitive, compassionate, and non-retraumatizing for clients who may have experienced trauma. Traditional ABA focuses on analyzing and modifying behaviors through environmental contingencies to improve socially significant skills, often for individuals with autism or developmental disabilities. However, it has faced criticism for potentially overlooking the emotional and historical context of behaviors, especially if trauma (e.g., abuse, neglect, bullying, or adverse childhood experiences) is a factor, which can make standard procedures like extinction or demand-heavy tasks feel coercive or distressing.In contrast, trauma-informed ABA:

• Acknowledges trauma’s prevalence and impact: It recognizes that up to 50-60% of people experience at least one traumatic event, and behaviors may serve as coping mechanisms rather than just “problems” to eliminate.

• Prioritizes safety, trust, and empowerment: Interventions emphasize creating predictable, choice-based environments, avoiding punitive strategies, and building replacement skills that promote self-advocacy and emotional regulation.

• Aligns with ABA ethics: It supports the Behavior Analyst Certification Board’s (BACB) Ethics Code for Behavior Analysts (2020), particularly principles like treating clients with compassion, dignity, and respect (Core Principle 2), obtaining informed consent/assent (Code 2.11), and individualizing services to prevent harm (Code 2.01).

• Key practices include:

  • Comprehensive assessments that screen for trauma history and triggers.

  • Preference for reinforcement-based strategies (e.g., differential reinforcement of alternative behaviors) over punishment or extinction, which can evoke trauma responses like bursting or aggression.

  • Incorporating client choice, collaboration with families/caregivers, and self-awareness among practitioners to avoid countertransference or burnout.

  • Holistic focus: Addressing physiological effects of trauma (e.g., toxic stress) on learning and behavior.

This approach is particularly relevant for populations with elevated trauma risks, such as children in foster care, autistic individuals facing sensory overload or social rejection, or those with intellectual disabilities. Research shows it can enhance treatment effectiveness and public perception of ABA by reducing harm and improving outcomes like skill acquisition and emotional well-being.Which Board Certifies It? There is no specific board certification exclusively for trauma-informed ABA from the BACB, the primary certifying body for ABA professionals (issuing credentials like BCBA, BCaBA, and RBT). The BACB oversees general ABA certification but does not offer a dedicated trauma-informed credential, as TIC is viewed as an ethical overlay rather than a standalone specialty. Instead:

• BACB integration: Trauma-informed practices are encouraged through continuing education (CEU) requirements. BCBAs must complete ethics and supervision CEUs, and many trauma-focused trainings qualify as Type 2 (related) CEUs. For example, the BACB Ethics Code explicitly supports trauma-sensitive practices to avoid harm.

• No formal ABA-specific trauma cert: Literature and practitioner discussions note a gap here; while ABA research on TIC is growing (e.g., special issues in Behavior Analysis in Practice), certification remains general.

Scarlet Sage Tail

Any corrections, or information on Grey Area Monarch and Moch mob email scarletsagegorwss101@proton.me

• foxblog3 substack [fb3]

• foxblog5 current wordpress symbolism blog [fb5]

• foxblog1 old wordpress, some great posts [fb1]

Posts are reposted here first Scarlet Sage Telegram Group