MockStalk 5 She Stalked Them All - Child D
ChildStalking
Child Stalker - Sarah Moch Stalks Minors
Sarah stalked Jessie’s children on various social media platforms. I do not intend to name the platforms but this post is about Sarah Moch stalking minor child D. The screenshots are used to show evidence of Moch’s stalking and re-posting, but with personal data redacted.
It’s creepy to stalk minor children, especially minor children that you do not know, and even creepier to follow them. To then publicly boast about doing that it is even more worrying. Welcome to the weird world of Sarah Moch, where it seems no low is too low and child stalking is all the rage.
Here is Sarah boasting that she follows two of Jessie’s sons, at least one of which is a minor.
Moch group members lap it up as usual eg Judmc, Meredith, Cindy Adams. They seem to agree that child stalking is ok and pay homage to their cult leader with emojis.
Sarah Reposts Jessie’s Minor Children’s Posts onto her Hate Group
This is Child D, the second minor child that Sarah has stalked. After stalking and following the child, Moch then posts the children’s profiles and which social media they are on, to her public group.
The group talk about and name Jessie’s minor children on their group eg Quokka Noodle comments liked by Moch and Adams.
eg 57117 Adams - Cindy Adams.
Sarah Moch reposted Jessie’s children’s social media photos, with the minor’s faces redacted or partially redacted but still showing some parts of some of their faces on her controversial survivor hate group. The red was Moch’s partial redaction, the rest mine. Moch also deliberately showed their account names.
Moch even commented that were 3 minor children in the photograph, which she has put onto her hate group, not fully redacted. Liked again by Judmc and Meredith.
Moch’s Stalking and Harassment
When challenged about her stalking and harassment behaviour then Sarah gets abusive. Ad hominem abuse is one of Sarah Moch’s traits and of the group. Ad hominem abuse is often used as a way of not addressing the message, but detracting and diminishing it by attacking the messenger. They try and pretend some of it is just having a laugh.
Moch reacts angrily to accusations of stalking and harassment, and no wonder as she is caught red handed. With worrying delusions of grandeur, Sarah tries to pretend she is a journalist to distract from her stalking. She is not a journalist, not even remotely close.
Moch has proven by her actions time and again that she is a stalker - an obsessive fixated stalker, out of control. Being a stalker does not make Sarah a journalist.
She admits to researching “direct sources” - so Sarah is trying to justify using children as “direct sources”. Even if that were true and it is absolutely disputable, then the “research” should not be flippantly posted onto her public hate group.
Moch then guiltily states that she did not contact Jessie’s children. She has obviously “researched” the children ie stalked minors, and then reposted their social media details onto her group. She has zero justification.
Even Moch’s statement that she did not contact the children is certainly debateable. Is following them not a form of contact? If they see who has made a follow, and even more so if they accept a follow or friend request, is this not contact?
Jessie’s minor children will never have thought that Sarah was stalking them, and not only having stalked them but also their minor brothers and sisters, and the siblings over 18. Moch also stalked their mother and wider family as well.
It is up to each individual to behave responsibly as they see fit, with the information that they have available. Sarah has shown by her own actions, that she made choices that many will see as a deliberate misuse of a minor’s data in order to further her vendetta against the parent. That behaviour is down to Sarah and her responsibility alone. She should apologise, there is zero moral justification for her actions. Further, most people would say it is unChristian behaviour, yet Moch states she is a Christian.
Sarah lies that she has not stalked or harassed anyone, see MochStalk, She Stalked Them All 1 - Introduction [SSMS1] for definitions which clearly show her behaviour can be classified as stalking, and this series MochStalk, She Stalked Them All will help to demonstrate that, as well as Series Sarah Moch's Stalk and Snitch. (for links see end of article)
Moch - Desperate for Dirt
Why is Sarah Moch so desperate for dirt that she tries to find some dirt on minor children’s social media? If Jessie was as bad as Moch tries to make out there would be plenty of dirt without having to involve minor children.
Moch and her group appear short of material to try and make Jessie appear bad, so not only do they fabricate information, and repost already public tweets but also stalk minor children [SSMS3] in a desperate effort to dig some up. Moch did not find any dirt on the children’s profiles, but she still chooses to repost the minor children’s social media profiles and details.
The reposting appears to be to demonstrate publicly that she has actually done the stalking. This of course has the effect that others will be encouraged to do the same and to make Jessie fearful for her children that are being stalked. This appears to be the intended effect and is reprehensible.
No child deserves stalking to serve the purposes of an adult, never mind to satisfy fixated obsessions of Moch’s vendetta.
How would Sarah Moch like it if people stalked her children? Her stalking of other people’s children may encourage others to do the same reprehensible behaviour to her, but Moch would have no moral defence. Does her husband Dontay know that Sarah is engaging in behaviour that could endanger their children? Surely he could not support his wife’s stalking of children?
Conclusion
Moch should apologise for stalking Jessie’s children and reposting their material. This is the fourth example and including at least 2 minor children. If Moch does not apologise it is clear that she has no shame and no empathy with other people’s innocent children. It is clear that something is wrong with her if she can justify to herself that stalking children is legitimate.
Has Sarah Moch no moral compass?
Other Stalking Posts
MochStalk 1, She Stalked Them All - Introduction [SSMS1]
MochStalk 2 She Stalked Them All - Child A [SSMS2]
Mochstalk 3 She Stalked Them All - Child B [SSMS3]
MochStalk 4 She Stalked Them All - Child C [SSMS4]
#SarahTheStalker #MochStalk #StalkerSarah #ObsessedSarah #FixatedSarah #DontayMoch #SarahMoch #ChildStalker #SarahTheChildStalker
Previous Posts on Moch’s mob
Scarlet Sage Index [SSI]
Sarah Moch's anti-Survivor, Hate Group - Hating on Survivor X [SSASH1]
Sarah Moch’s anti-Survivor, Hate Group 2 - Paula Blades Hating on Survivor Svali [SSASH2] [SSPB1}
Sarah Moch's anti-Survivor, Hate Group 3 - Hating on Survivor Y [SSASH3]
Sarah Moch 1 – Spiteful, Yes Spiteful! [SSSM1]
Sarah Moch 2 – Toxic Ostrich [SSSM2]
Sarah Moch 3 - Moch's Magik Piano [SSSM3]
Sarah Moch's Stalk and Snitch 1 - Is it Safe or Effective? [SSSS1]
Sarah Moch’s Stalk and Snitch 2 - Brother [SSSS2]
MochStalk 1, She Stalked Them All - Introduction [SSMS1]
MochStalk 2 She Stalked Them All - Child A [SSMS2]
Mochstalk 3 She Stalked Them All - Child B [SSMS3]
MochStalk 4 She Stalked Them All - Child C [SSMS4]
Moch’s Myths 1 - Sarah's Antichrist Election Idiocy [SSMM1]
Mochs Myths 2 - Jessie's Dead Baby was not a Giant Rat or Troll Doll [SSMM2]
George B. Bailey Part 1 [SSBB1]
George B Bailey 2 Tags and Tantrums [SSBB2]
Corrections or stories about the Moch mob, email scarletsagegorwss101@proton.me