David Hall / Grey Area Operator Porn Accounts Summary
GrEyporner 7 - Summary and Update on and the GreyAreaOperator Porn Accounts
In Dec 2024 a researcher found that an account called GreyAreaOperator had 3 porn accounts. Details were released by HoyaFlower, who said “Another so called “victims’ advocate” caught on porn sites.! I’ll bet he’ll say it was for (cough, cough) “research” just like they all do!”
Grey Area Monarch - The GrEyPorner 1 [SSGM22]
Grey Area Operator also happens to be one Grey Area Monarch’s aka David Hall’s aka many aliases. These are some of David Hall’s aliases, AKA grey area monarch AKA grey shadow AKA Organize Safety AKA Apoceclipse0510 AKA DoAnythingNowAI AKA pbandjandbread AKA ButterfingerBBZ AKA dharmicsage , as well as many more not exposed yet. Grey Area Operator was one that he has used to harass at least two people. Despite that, David never came clean as to whether they were his porn accounts or not.
His flying monkey of the moment defended him blindly and inaccurately. StellarFox16 falsely said that it was not a username that he used. She was corrected by people at the time, but she never apologised or corrected her falsehoods, something common to all of those surrounding David Hall.
Grey Area Monarch - The GrEyPorner 2 [SSGM23]
David loves the kind of blind allegiance that StellarFox16 showed, as this saves him from having to be accountable, often from indefensible behaviour. He let others defend him about the porn accounts, whilst not even bothering to admit publicly to Stellar that he did use this alias. Why did David not tell her that he had alias GreyAreaOperator? It looks to be cowardly behaviour.
Only about 3 months later Stellar turned from being the blindly following chief flying monkey to deserting David and she blocked him. She saw for herself what kind of person he is… “a liar who uses abuse tactics” who “cries victim” and he is “perpetuating drama that is pulling in survivors”…
Yes Stellar was pulled in and loyally defended David, presumably as she did not believe that he would have porn accounts, but David did not bother to tell her that it was an alias he used.
In the last year or so, we have learned much more about how David frames and reframes actions and his propaganda personality, particularly after StellarFox16 rejected him and he melted down. This was David reframing the exposé of the porn accounts, without even mentioning them, as by “evil cowards” who all group together to attack him!
The GrEyPorner 5 - SuperPornMan’s Response to His Porn Accounts Exposure [SSGM27]
David framed the fact that 3 accounts were found with his alias, as an attack on him as by “evil cowards” and “predators”. This inverts the fact that the predator is the porn user not the whistleblower exposing it, and the evil coward is the one who does not confirm or deny whether they are his accounts.
David then reframed himself as the survivor hero, sucking up the attacks and therefore diverting attacks from others. The accounts were in his name. No one else was the “next person” who would have been attacked. David was not even being attacked, he was just being exposed, but David does not let the facts get in the way of his latest propaganda narrative and framing! A supposed defender of trafficked people was being exposed as a hypocrite and supporter of human trafficking, if the accounts were his.
David framed the people who exposed him as “evil cowards” who all group together. These is another of David’s tactics - all the many people who oppose him, for anything, for a plethora of different reasons, he tries to lump together as one group. It is then easier to malign them all with his absurd generalisations or ad hominem insults and lies, rather than him having to deal with the real issues that he is presented with.
There is repetition of “evil cowards”, as well as “pathetic predators”. Classic inversion, still not having dealing with the issues, as well as repetition for propaganda purposes.
David said that he was sorry for the survivors who were dealing with it, ie. StellarFox16 - his chief flying monkey, who leapt to his defence and she foolishly and falsely claimed that it was not an alias he used. She should not have had to deal with it, but David did not address it. David should have stood up and admitted that it was an alias that he used, and confirmed or denied that they were his porn accounts and addressed the issues. David as so often chose the coward’s way and he allowed a woman defend him with false information that he chose not to correct.
David, trained in luciferian propaganda, then falsely framed / classified people who hold him accountable as FMSF - False Memory Syndrome Foundation adjacent or worse. David of course provides no evidence, just more empty rhetoric and false accusations, which is what he does. David should name each one, and show the evidence linking them to the FMSF. He will not of course, because it’s propaganda and lies not truth.
Linking people to a group that already has a bad reputation, especially in the survivor world, is another tactic David frequently uses. There is no evidence for any link to FMSF, (False Memory Syndrome Foundation) it’s just a nasty propaganda trick that David uses. He falsely groups everyone who opposes him as all part of the same group, then that they are all in a bad group, or close to a bad group. This tactic he knows is likely to trigger survivors who are on his side because he is, or claims to be a survivor.
More false accusations, more lies, again no evidence. Time after time David does this. He is quite predictable once you spot the patterns of his behaviour. He uses repetition so people might actually believe he is being attacked rather than the reality, which is him doing the attacking.
After a couple more days, David obliquely addressed the allegations by a subtweet, trying to dismiss it all as “gotchas” and the people who exposed it as not dealing with the actual issues.
Grey Area Monarch - The GrEyPorner 3 [SSGM24]
Inversion again. There were many issues of importance, and it was David himself who was avoiding the many real issues by trying to dismiss it as a gotcha.
David had previously traded heavily on that he was supposed to be campaigning against human trafficking, yet it appeared that he was supporting human trafficking with 3 porn accounts. That’s an issue which David is trying to ignore!
His wife Emma from the Imagination Podcast had been tweeting the month before…
“Porn is human trafficking”
“Porn = getting off to women being abused and exploited”
“like getting off to a chick being raped in front of you”
“Many of those women ARE being raped - you just don’t know it”
“Have some respect for women and for yourself, bro”
“Stand against it”
“Stand up for and protect women”
If the porn accounts were her husband David’s accounts then he was supporting human trafficking and “getting off to women being abused and exploited and raped” in front of him, as described by his wife. That’s an issue for him and her, the people who follow him and any survivors of trafficking. Also his lack of integrity is an issue for everyone who heard him.
Another major issue were the women being exploited, that he was possibly helping to exploit whilst pretending to campaign against trafficking. Why did he not address that? The issue was one of huge hypocrisy if true. There were other issues…
Why does GreyAreaMonarch / Grey Area Operator think that he does not have to explain himself to survivors of sex and human trafficking?
Why does he feel that he does not have to explain himself to women when he has utterly failed, not only to protect them, but actually feeding their trafficking?
Why does he feel that he does not have to explain himself to anyone that has supported him or followed him, and that he has let down when he has been claiming to support victims but actually supporting their predators?
If they were David’s accounts, then it also is an issue why David is using porn when he is meant to be married to Emma. Most women would feel humiliation under those circumstances. Others would see it as a humiliation for Emma, that David would prefer to have 3 porn accounts than a healthy relationship with Emma.
It also raises questions again about the marriage. Are they really married? Is it a sham marriage? Do they live together?
David was the one who was not addressing the issues - either whether they were his accounts or not, his hypocrisy or the other issues of trafficking and porn.
The following month someone mentioned porn to David and he deflected / dismissed it as “greyareaoperator thing”, but he went no further.
David tried to give the impression that it was not him, whilst not denying it.
Three weeks later, over two months after the exposure of the porn accounts under his alias, David finally addressed the issue. However he did it in such an opaque manner that it raised more questions that it answered.
David admitted nothing, he deliberately obfuscated and confused and hid behind other survivors - a common tactic of his and the very issue that Stellar had mentioned when she left him, that he creates drama and involves other survivors.
It seems that David only finally addressed the issue as the account that reposted about the porn accounts was a large account which got many views. David used his usual technique of lumping them in as part of the same mythical group, which does not even exist. This is his tweet…
Grey Area Monarch / David Hall 2025 Feb 25
The screenshots he attached are in Appendix 2.
Grey Area Monarch Feb 25 2025 Tweet Analysis
Time for an adult talk about retraumatizing accusations and pornography. This is serious, and is a subject that often comes up in the world of RAMCOA. Despite a series of heinous accusations, I am comfortable discussing this for the benefit of other survivors.
David immediately tries to portray the exposé as “heinous accusations” intended to traumatise him. Then he plays the hero that he will discuss this for other survivors. He is playing the victim for all he is worth, just like his ex flying money and others said that he does. He does not even discuss whether the accusations were genuine. All he had to do was confirm or deny that the accounts were his.
For anyone that knows me and my family - and the history - they may already be aware, but FWIW I was raised by pornographers. I’m not the only one in my family who has addressed this (see first attachment). Growing up my own mother was also an escort and asset in MONARCH, and I was used and abused in pornography myself. This is unfortunately commonplace in the world of RAMCOA.
David claimed that he was brought up by pornographers, and included a copy of his elder sister’s story, whose veracity is not tested, and says that he was used in pornography. This is very sad if true, I have helped tell the stories of many survivors. Many, many survivors had horrific upbringings, and they do not go on to be predators like David, and they do not attack survivors like David does, who may well have had a similar upbringing. David has programmed survivors and threatened and attacked and gang stalked many more. The stories of most of those that David relentlessly attacks, day in day out are very sad. Why are there different rules for the ones he attacks, often with no evidence? Why does he not have empathy for them? He has been shown evidence of the grey area operator porn accounts, to confirm or deny. Again he chooses not to do so, but as ever he plays the victim card.
David then goes on the attack.
Chris - and the malicious group he pulled this information from - have been using falsely framed information that retraumatizes survivors not only to smear me, but to attempt to repel survivors away from key information they can use to help themselves. I’m the subject, but it’s an attack on the community. The parties distributing this information have a pattern of attacking many helpful advocates of survivors as well as whistleblowers.
As he often does, David tries to pretend that Chris is part of a big group that targets him. David does not name names of any group, as it is not true. It’s a figment of his imagination and propaganda. The people who see through David are about as far from a group as possible, but that does not suit David’s time worn agenda of grouping everyone together and then dismissing them with an insult, and ad hominem attack, a false smear or other luciferian propaganda techniques that he uses. David tries to categorise the information as “falsely framed”. He does not state what the false framing is and he does not deny that he had porn accounts.
Laughably when he gets to a semi - specific he pontificates that it is all to “repel survivors away from key information”. Bizarre. It is David’s repeated nefarious behaviour that is the problem. It is nothing whatsoever to do with other survivors, nothing to do with anyone else’s information. David then goes on to hide behind this false allegation that there is no evidence and pretending that it was an attempt to repel survivors. Trying to portray it as an attack on all survivors is…
an attempt to deflect attention and culpability away from him
to get survivors on his side
a way that he can pretend that nothing is his fault
so that he can hide his behaviour behind other survivors
so that he can pretend to be some sort of hero and representative of other survivors and be fighting on their behalf
David loves trying to hide behind other survivors and “the survivor community”. He uses other survivors as a shield for his misdeeds.
David inverts everything. He goes on…
Unfortunately porn sites have some of the largest username databases. I wouldn’t stoop so low to claim there is a real connection based on username... such as with the multiple porn sites attached to the name ‘averagechris’ which I show (last three attachments) as a counterexample. It could be, but to definitively frame that is not only dishonest, but malicious. I’m just showing how easy it is to establish a false connection.
David attacks Chris to deflect from himself. Chris had nothing to do with the exposé. He just reposted it. The reason David is doing this is because Chris gets alot of views. Even if the accounts that David dug up were Chris’s, then as far as I know Chris has not campaigned against porn or trafficking. He is not hypocritical. David constantly portrayed himself as a leading voice against trafficking. As the original tweet pointed out, it said a “victim’s advocate caught on porn sites”.
One issue is a betrayal of trust, and David refuses to face it. It’s the hypocrisy and trust angles that matter. All it needed from David was a confirmation or denial and an apology if true, a promise to do better and it would be an opportunity to outline the problems. But no, all David gave was obfuscation, false attacks on others and massive deflection as well as hiding behind survivors.
“So what’s the truth?” David asked the question but he dodged answering his own question about the truth. Yet again.
“Did I create usernames on website to view porn? He dodged answering this question as well. He does not confirm or deny. Yet again.
“First of all... who makes an account to watch porn?!” Deflection. Obviously many have done and do.
“Regardless that these multiple years old accounts referenced seemingly having no history”. Although the Grey Area Operator accounts were started several years ago, there is no indication, as he is trying to imply, that they were out of date accounts. Does he have insider knowledge of the accounts? Then come clean.
“…still, perhaps I was addicted to porn and it was something I dealt with”. Why the obfuscation? He appears to be trying to confuse again and claim that if he was addicted to porn, then it was all in the past. If he was, then he should come clean precisely because he is always, very aggressively, demanding accountability from others. David always tries to play by two rules, one for him, one for others, accountability for others but not for him.
“That is something that is unfortunately commonplace to those recovering from RAMCOA”. It may well be and people would be sympathetic, but David’s modus operandi is to demand others are “accountable for their actions” - Why is different for him than for those that he demands accountability from?
“What if I was in the industry myself and on videos with my ex GF, but we fought to get out of that world before I spoke back out publicly. Another unfortunate commonplace situation”. What iffery? David tries to play for sympathy without admitting anything. David repeatedly and relentlessly attacks other survivors and others for the faults that he perceives in them, why should he not be exposed for doing wrong. Why is he not accountable? The criticism appears to be most about hypocrisy, and double standards rather than having accounts per se. He should face that, but he runs away yet again.
“Maybe as part of RAMCOA investigations an account was required to gain access to certain areas of the website...” David then obfuscate more. He tries to hide behind a story that he might have been carrying out “investigations”. This excuse was predicted by Hoya Flower in the original tweet ”I’ll bet he’ll say it was for (cough, cough) “research” just like they all do!”. David hides behind excuse after excuse but not given as facts, given as whatiffery and maybe-ery.
“or maybe it’s just a username that isn’t actually mine. Again, unfortunately porn sites have some of the largest username bases and it’s easy to pull up a variety of usernames”. Perhaps so, but David does not deny that it is his, but tries to cast doubt that it is. Why does David keep obfuscating?
“Given The Average Chris’ MO, as well as the group he got those screenshots from, there is a pattern of clear intent to defame and to frame everything negatively, assuming the worst and making malicious accusations, while disregarding and circumventing anything explanatory or exculpatory”. David gives no evidence for his accusations. Again David tries to group everyone who opposes him, for every different reason as all acting in a group. It’s not true, but useful propaganda for him, to then dismiss them all in a stroke. However he could be describing his own behaviour of defamation, framing everything negatively, assuming the worst, making malicious accusations, disregarding and circumventing anything explanatory and exculpatory. This is David’s exact behaviour. The reverse attribution behaviour of dark personality.
“To do this with perverted material…” No one except David mentioned “perverted material”, nor was there any perverted material produced. Was David watching perverted material? Why did he mention it?
“that retraumatizes survivors that have been through this abuse is disgusting”…There were no attempts to retraumatise survivors, there were attempts to get David to hold himself accountable, because he insists everyone else is held accountable. His rules. If people cannot be called out for hypocritical behaviour then anyone can get away with anything and play the victim, as David continually tries to do.
Chris has accused survivors at large of being liars and mentally ill and only seems to be feigning care to hide behind while he attacks. Truly disgusting and clear malintent. David does not provide examples and I do not know what Chris has or has not done. However Chris is just a useful target for David to try to deflect attention away from himself and for David to hide behind. I do know that David himself has made false accusations against people of being mentally ill, [SSGM11] and [SSGM13]. He also accuses many people of being liars, with zero evidence. So without any evidence I take what David says with a pinch of salt. He often fabricates false accusations against others. I also know that he has been or still is, friends with Paula Blades, George Bailey and Sarah Moch who all attack survivors, and he even uses false accusations from them against survivors, as documented on this Scarlet Sage blog, [SSGM70].
“Not just towards me, because this truly is not about me”. This was literally about David’s alias account. This is absolutely “truly” about David and how he shirks all responsibility. He is trying to make it about all survivors to pretend it is an attack on them and get them on his side, No it’s about David and David alone, but yet again he tries to hide behind other survivors and get them to defend him.
I’m not the only one who faces these types of attacks. Everyone speaking out does. The harder they push, the harder the pushback. This is my motivation. Knowing there are malicious parties out there targeting and preying on survivors and whistleblowers of RAMCOA. I will never stop doing what I’m doing, working to expose corruption and crimes and working to help other survivors! It is true that survivors face attacks, and I have been defending them and standing in front of many to take the attacks for longer than David has. In fact, David is one that attacks many, many survivors - more than anyone else I know. He is only being held to account in this blog, by me a non survivor as he attacked me relentlessly with lies for month after month, year after year, as well as attacking and bullying many others. David is deflecting justifiable questions as to whether they are his porn accounts onto all survivors. It’s cowardly. David over and over proves he is a coward, like most bullies are. David is held to account remarkably little, and perhaps that is to do with his partner henchman who is an accessory to his harm. Emma Katherine is a gatekeeper for David’s perpetration and she is also morally responsible for what David does, because she helps to cover it up by her silence.
I will continue this thread with quoted posts of the parties who disseminate this information maliciously - all whom I have exposed personally to elicit these attacks - for a myriad of offenses including systematically targeting survivors and whistleblowers. Again he tries to pretend that he calls people out and then they they turn on him. This is his much repeated mantra which is inversion of the truth. Various people refuse to succumb to David’s nasty control and manipulation techniques and particularly those who reject him. Then David gets mad and invents false accusations, which he labels as “calling people out”, inverting the reality.
David Demands Accountability From Others
Just to remind people of David pushing vociferously and abusively for others to be accountable and take responsibility. No one has even got anywhere near the level of vitriol that he gives out to others. Note also he makes ad hominem attacks spread liberally about as well. This is just a few.
There are many more than this, just search his timeline or there are some more here, previously documented…
Accept some responsibility you sociopath
…that doesn’t magically control your actions or absolve you of your own responsibility
As a man, take responsibility…
Focusing on ass, on the internet… Maybe you should be more situationally aware and take responsibility…
Take some responsibility for your own actions, boy!
Accept responsibility, you coward. Zero integrity.
You’ve taken zero responsibility or accountability for the many survivors you’ve upset…
Take responsibility for your actions like a man you evil coward
Grey Area Monarch - The GrEyPorner 2 [SSGM23].
David Hall loves throwing his words, but when it comes to living up to the words he throws at others, then he is hypocritically lacking in ethics, morals, honesty and integrity. Furthermore he is severely lacking in accountability and taking responsibility. Why does David aggressively insist that others have to have responsibility and be accountable, but consistently avoids it himself, whilst playing the victim?
Discussion
David always plays the holier than thou in demanding action from others, but when he frequently behaves abominably, then he never comes clean. Instead he attacks others, hides behind survivors, deflects and runs away like a coward. He cannot have it both ways, he should either stop lecturing others like a self righteous prig, or he should act the way that he aggressively demands that others do. Having been so vociferous on twitter about “taking responsibility” then equally GreyAreaMonarch should take responsibility on twitter for his own actions.
Over a year on and David has still not told us the truth. He seems to think that he is above being held accountable for his actions whilst he can demand accountability incessantly from others.
It’s about time that David behaved with honesty, integrity, morals and ethics instead of his usual cowardice, control and manipulation.
David’s tactics are those of a dark personality, of which several are shown here.
Attributes and Tactics of Dark Personalities / Persistent Predatory Personalities [fb32495].
David is the most destructive and divisive survivor on social media. He is propped up time after time by David’s wife and partner henchman Emma Katherine from the Imagination Podcast who lets him get away with all his nefarious behaviour. By her acquiescence Emma is an accessory to the harm that he causes at the very least. David is dangerous for survivors and survivors should keep well away for their own safety.
Just before the porn accounts were found, Emma had been saying that “If you support / watch porn then you are supporting / watching human trafficking. Period.”
That’s very clear, so why did Emma not have something publicly to say about the greyareaoperator porn accounts? If they were not David’s then it would be best to clear the air, so that Emma was not tainted by having a husband who supports human trafficking whilst supposedly campaigning against it. If they were his accounts then Emma should be calling for David to be held responsible and accountable as he is so vehement and adamant that others should be held responsible and accountable for their actions.
David tried to avoid any accountability and responsibility and pass it off as a gotcha versus the actual issues. But some of the serious issues had been outlined by Emma, that “porn = getting off to women being abused and exploited”, and that it was “like getting off to a chick being raped in front of you”.
Why didn’t David address those issues?
Why didn’t Emma call for David to “Stand up for and protect women”? Why didn’t Emma call for David to explain, as she had said “Porn is human trafficking” and had told others to stand against porn?
If they were David’s accounts, then on a personal note he was humiliating his wife Emma by watching porn accounts. Why was David not responsible and accountable for that humiliation and acknowledge it and publicly apologise to Emma, as the humiliation has been public?
Equally though Emma, ignored it all. If she is campaigning against porn, and castigating others publicly, then why is she not making a statement about it? It is not acceptable to just ignore it when her own husband appears to be involved in what she called human trafficking and much more. It makes her look pretty stupid and hypocritical otherwise, and yet another time that she covers for predators.
It all reeks of one rule for David and Emma and one for everyone else. This is seen time and again with these two. It is another time that Emma is an accessory to harm and does not call David out.
Thread on Grey Area Operator’s Porn Exposé [GAMPorn]
Previous Posts on David Hall and Porn
Grey Area Monarch - The GrEyPorner 1 [SSGM22] It is revealed that Grey Area Monarch has 3 porn accounts.
Grey Area Monarch - The GrEyPorner 2 [SSGM23] More details come available on Grey Area Monarch and his 3 porn accounts under his alternative name GreyAreaOperator.
Grey Area Monarch - The GrEyPorner 3 [SSGM24] Grey Area Monarch tries to dismiss the porn accounts as just a gotcha, despite his wife’s views on porn.
Grey Area Monarch - The GrEyPorner 4, His Views on Porn [SSGM26] Grey Area Monarch’s own views revealed on porn prior to his being caught out.
The GrEyPorner 5 - SuperPornMan’s Response to His Porn Accounts Exposure [SSGM27] Grey Area Monarch plays the hero for being attacked over his porn accounts.
GrEyPorner 6 - Still No Accountability from Grey about his 3 Porn Accounts [SSGM32] Grey Area Monarch still trying to avoid taking responsibility for his porn account hypocrisy despite his supposed anti trafficking stance.
Questions that David Hall Needs to Answer [SSGM65]
Grey Area Operator Index [SSGMIn]
Summary on Agent Grey Area Operator [SSGM53]
Appendix 1
Text of tweet David as Grey Area Monarch Feb 25 2025
Time for an adult talk about retraumatizing accusations and pornography. This is serious, and is a subject that often comes up in the world of RAMCOA. Despite a series of heinous accusations, I am comfortable discussing this for the benefit of other survivors.
For anyone that knows me and my family - and the history - they may already be aware, but FWIW I was raised by pornographers. I’m not the only one in my family who has addressed this (see first attachment). Growing up my own mother was also an escort and asset in MONARCH, and I was used and abused in pornography myself. This is unfortunately commonplace in the world of RAMCOA.
Chris - and the malicious group he pulled this information from - have been using falsely framed information that retraumatizes survivors not only to smear me, but to attempt to repel survivors away from key information they can use to help themselves. I’m the subject, but it’s an attack on the community. The parties distributing this information have a pattern of attacking many helpful advocates of survivors as well as whistleblowers.
Unfortunately porn sites have some of the largest username databases. I wouldn’t stoop so low to claim there is a real connection based on username... such as with the multiple porn sites attached to the name ‘averagechris’ which I show (last three attachments) as a counterexample. It could be, but to definitively frame that is not only dishonest, but malicious. I’m just showing how easy it is to establish a false connection.
So what’s the truth? Did I create usernames on website to view porn? First of all... who makes an account to watch porn?! Regardless that these multiple years old accounts referenced seemingly having no history, still, perhaps I was addicted to porn and it was something I dealt with. That is something that is unfortunately commonplace to those recovering from RAMCOA. What if I was in the industry myself and on videos with my ex GF, but we fought to get out of that world before I spoke back out publicly. Another unfortunate commonplace situation. Maybe as part of RAMCOA investigations an account was required to gain access to certain areas of the website... or maybe it’s just a username that isn’t actually mine. Again, unfortunately porn sites have some of the largest username bases and it’s easy to pull up a variety of usernames.
Given The Average Chris’ MO, as well as the group he got those screenshots from, there is a pattern of clear intent to defame and to frame everything negatively, assuming the worst and making malicious accusations, while disregarding and circumventing anything explanatory or exculpatory. To do this with perverted material that retraumatizes survivors that have been through this abuse is disgusting. Chris has accused survivors at large of being liars and mentally ill and only seems to be feigning care to hide behind while he attacks. Truly disgusting and clear malintent. Not just towards me, because this truly is not about me.
I’m not the only one who faces these types of attacks. Everyone speaking out does. The harder they push, the harder the pushback. This is my motivation. Knowing there are malicious parties out there targeting and preying on survivors and whistleblowers of RAMCOA. I will never stop doing what I’m doing, working to expose corruption and crimes and working to help other survivors!
I will continue this thread with quoted posts of the parties who disseminate this information maliciously - all whom I have exposed personally to elicit these attacks - for a myriad of offenses including systematically targeting survivors and whistleblowers.
Appendix 2 Timeline and Context
Bizarrely David who says he protects his family, involves his elder sister in his stories, with redacted stories but which are easy to search for. I have not myself, but he constantly drops clues and then cries doxxing when people have followed them up. The irony is that he doxxes others, whilst all his claims of doxxing are false, as he was doing interviews in 2022 showing his face with this names. They are all traps to play the victim and attack others.
David shows that there is a account or more than one under the name AverageChris.
Firstly Chris is a deflection from allegations against David of hypocrisy and of saying one thing but doing another. Furthermore, having dealt with David now for several years, nothing he says can be taken as true. Did David change his accounts to be called Averagechris for a “gotcha”? But even if they are Chris’s it is irrelevant. He has not campaigned against trafficking or porn like David and his wife. Even if he had, it is picking on someone to deflect rather than face the allegations per se, or even the person who posted them.
David repeatedly states that Shawn Ryan is a survivor, but relentlessly attacks him. Why the hypocrisy?
Any corrections, or information on David Hall aka Grey Area Monarch of Organize Safety, Emma Katherine Pietrzak of the Imagination Podcast, George Bailey, Mr.Dior and Moch mob, etc. email scarletsagegorwss101@proton.me
foxblog3 substack [fb3]
foxblog5 current wordpress symbolism blog [fb5]
foxblog1 old wordpress, some great posts [fb1]
My links are on own.page/foxblog
Posts are reposted here first Scarlet Sage Telegram Group