Bailey's Knock Knock 3 - Red Flags
Bailey's Knock Knock Part 3 Red Flags. May 4 - 17 2021
It’s slow progress but I am wading through the sewer of Bailey’s blog Outright Turds so that you do not have to. I have completed two more weeks worth, now about 6 weeks from his original “fishy” post. Bailey has still not offered up a correction, still no apology, he is still spouting false accusations and Bailey still continues his laughable analysis of his bizarre Belenoff controlled drama theory.
On May 4 he continued his Belenoff drama with a post…
2021 May 4 Who Really is Somerset Belenoff? [7a]
Apparently Bailey contacted Jeff Ramsperger…
I left it at that, since there was no point in debating the issue. I was not surprised at his response. Just disappointed that another person supposedly pursuing the truth was siding with a lie.
Jeff told Bailey that he had been contacted. At that Bailey did not carry on, disappointed that Jeff was “siding with a lie”. Bailey still of course wrongly believes that the Belenoff site and Jessie’s site are both registered by the same company, so he flippantly throws his accusations about, whilst people laugh at him.
In fact I also received a communication purporting to be from the Belenoff website. I wrote about it specifically here, 2021 Apr 2 foxblog1 Somerset Belenoff 3 [11]. I have no idea if it is an impersonator as Bailey maintains, but Bailey produces zero evidence for his opinion, as per usual.
Indeed its very strange that Bailey never referred to my post nor the one I had posted the day before, 2021 Apr 1 cathyfoxblog Somerset Belenoff 2 [10]. After all, his original post where he made the disastrous mistake was published just 3 days after my Belenoff 3 post [11]. He did make mention of me but not these 2 posts, which included relevant evidence. Odd.
In his May 4 post Bailey also claims
The website that inspired the central hoax of Somerset Belenoff being the powerful “Queen of the Illuminati” starting in January of 2020. The site is a mix of the paranormal, danger and numerous typos. A general creepiness prevails as if one should not speak ill of Belenoff least some evil would befall one’s life. The site is a mix of true events and real people and the rest is complete fiction.
He goes on…
Nothing on this site is sourced yet the Jessie Czebotar facilitators, people such as Cathy Fox, Sarah Westall, Jeff Ramsperger, Brice Watson, etc, use this site as a source. Imagine that, using an unsourced website as a source! And they collectively doubt not a word of it as they never question Jessie’s stories.
I was going to leave all Bailey’s false and bizarre criticisms of me until a separate post, but there is more than I thought, so I will address most of it going along, and sweep up that which I have missed later. I can only speak for myself, not the others Bailey accuses, but he claims that I…
“use the site as a source“
“using an unsourced website as a source”
“collectively they doubt not a word of it as they never question Jessie’s stories”
“use the site as a source“
Bailey claims I use the site as a source. Technically he is correct as I included a link to the site, in my post where I give a wide ranging and well sourced initial discussion of the site Belenoff and Q [9]. Of course, that’s what proper researchers do, give many links and sources, and reference in the text at the appropriate point. That is as it should be. In the post I included many links and made suggestions for further research. [9]
However behind Bailey’s comment is the implication that I took what the site said as correct uncritically. But if Bailey had paid attention to my post from 3 months before his, he would have seen and read this…
“a bit cloak and dagger and sensationist”
“suspicion that this type of site may be a set up”
“There is also much information on the Who is Somerset website, but do not know the accuracy.”
There is more of course. It is clear that contrary to what Bailey insinuated. I was sceptical of the site, as I made clear, but Bailey chose to insinuate the opposite. There was zero valid reason for Bailey to attack me as he did. There are more of his unjustified attacks that have been missed out for brevity but check for yourself 2021 Jan 23 foxblog1 Belenoff and Q [9]
“using an unsourced website as a source”
Bailey is wrong again. It is not unsourced, there is evidence and documentation put forward, pdfs purporting to be Interpol Red notices.
Why did Bailey not check these sources? Why did he say it was unsourced? Did he not check properly again before writing? Did he not even see them? Bailey seems as though he is in a rush to splurge his opinion out, before he researches properly. This is becoming a pattern.
Also there is nothing wrong with using an unsourced website or book as a source, as long as the limitations of the source are made clear, or for instance if it is a primary source whistle blower where that evidence is just not available for the public, due to the nature of the abuse.
“collectively they doubt not a word of it as they never question Jessie’s stories”
I can only speak for myself. Bailey yet again writes nonsense. He hasn’t a clue what questions I asked Jessie. Why is he so determined, time and time again to keep making things up? He keeps attacking me and attempting to discredit me, with no justification and despite the clear evidence that he is the inadequate researcher and that much of what he writes is just plain wrong. Has Bailey got an ulterior motive?
Bailey’s next post along the Outright Trends sewer was 2021 May 17 Damage Control [5a]
On par, she [Jessie] once again stated that Somerset Belenoff is a real person with a real history. Utter nonsense (see link below) but she is sticking to it. She backed off a bit on
Bailey produces no evidence that Belenoff is not a real person. it’s just Bailey’s opinion again, which he gives as if it is a fact. In fact he ignored some evidence, without mentioning it, that Belenoff does exist, which will be covered in future posts. Bailey directs readers to a “link below” but does not make clear which link. We have to assume that he is talking about his already discredited post with his disastrous fishy Knock Knock error [1a]!
He then accuses Jessie of fibbing…
Jessie then went on to fib up a storm, even saying everything I have written regarding her is false. Which is totally untrue.
Yet again Bailey produces no evidence that they were fibs. If there was evidence then why has he not produced it?
Bailey says what Jessie said is “totally untrue”. There is already 100% proof that Bailey is incorrect on the connection of Jessie’s website to Belenoff website, see Bailey's Knock Knock Conspiracy Hoax Part 1 [SSBB4], and further evidence will come in my next post. So Bailey’s quote about Jessie “saying everything I have written regarding her is false. Which is totally untrue” is incorrect. At the very least then some of what he has written is provably false. His narrative is just in tatters.
Bailey whines on…
Dave Zublick had so much disdain for me that he refused to mention my name or site (no worries) showing he doesn’t undertake journalism,
Zublick was generous to George, if he had seen the quality of Bailey’s work, then he might have referred to him as a shitposter.
Bailey cannot resist giving his misplaced opinion…
To be fair, the safe place Dave Zublick provides for Jessie her other interviewers do as well. People such as Cathy Fox, Sarah Westall, Jeff Ramsperger, George Iceman, Carmen Smith Studer, etc.
There are several things these characters all have in common. One is that they never question Jessie in their interviews of her. They never ask for evidence no matter how outlandish her tales get. They are unconcerned regarding facts as Jessie relates her stories to them.
He says that the people mentioned “never ask for evidence”. I can only speak for myself. Yet again, Bailey fabricates a narrative. He hasn’t a clue what I have asked for. Why does he presume to know and give his false opinion?
“Unconcerned regarding facts”
This again is totally untrue as regard myself. It appears that Bailey is possibly projecting as after 6 weeks after his ridiculous accusations of connections between Jessie’s website Belenoff website, he still is unconcerned with researching the very core allegations of his fishy Knock Knock theory. So it may well be correct to say that Bailey is unconcerned about facts as he cannot be bothered to undertake a 2 minute search, before posting or since.
Bailey carries on…
None of these apologists are doing journalism, they are instead suborning Jessie Czebotar’s falsehoods and in process trying to ease any damage to their traffic and resulting revenue. These people are an angry bunch, attacking skeptics as bad Christians, stone throwers, haters and inviting the wrath of almighty God. By doing so, they fit the definition of a cult. [5a]
I am not sure if I am included in this bunch of “apologists” and Bailey needs to make it very clear that I am not, as he is making serious allegations. He leaves it open by innuendo.
Suborning is to induce secretly to do an unlawful thing, to induce to commit perjury
I have not, never have and I am not suborning anyone. Bailey has no evidence that this is the case, and if he is making these allegations about anyone he needs to produce the evidence, immediately. #BaileyTheLip
Discussion
Bailey gets more outlandish in each post. He throws about false accusations like confetti. It seems as if defamation and libel are tactics that Bailey uses, assuming he will get away with it.
Bailey should correct his poor, near non existent research, he should apologise for his numerous errors and false accusations, libel and defamation. It’s only going to get worse for him, as his posts are dissected, to find them practically bare of any evidence for what he claims.
Any corrections, or information on the Moch mob, email me on scarletsagegorwss101@proton.me
Previous Posts on George W Bailey
George B. Bailey Part 1 [SSBB1]
George B Bailey 2 Tags and Tantrums [SSBB2]
George Bailey 3 - The Moch Mob DO Attack Survivors and Whistleblowers [SSBB3]
Bailey's Knock Knock Conspiracy Hoax Part 1 [SSBB4]
Bailey's Knock Knock 2 - He’s Caught Again [SSBB5]
Previous Posts on Moch’s Mob
Scarlet Sage Index [SSI]
Sarah Moch's anti-Survivor, Hate Group 1- Hating on Survivor X [SSASH1]
Sarah Moch’s anti-Survivor, Hate Group 2 - Paula Blades Hating on Survivor Svali [SSASH2] [SSPP1]
Sarah Moch's anti-Survivor, Hate Group 3 - Hating on Survivor Y [SSASH3]
Sarah Moch's anti-Survivor, Hate Group 4 - Hating on Whistleblower Tracy Remington [SSASH4]
Sarah Moch’s anti-Survivor, Hate Group 5 - Hating on Priscilla’s Testimony [SSASH5]
Sarah Moch 1 – Spiteful, Yes Spiteful! [SSSM1]
Sarah Moch 2 – Toxic Ostrich [SSSM2]
Sarah Moch 3 - Moch's Magik Piano [SSSM3]
Sarah Moch 4 Correction re Sarah Moch [SSSM4]
Sarah Moch 5 - Sarah Moch Finally Suspended from Twitter [SSSM5]
Sarah Moch's Stalk and Snitch 1 - Is it Safe or Effective? [SSSS1]
Sarah Moch’s Stalk and Snitch 2 - Brother [SSSS2]
Moch Intel 1 - What is Moch Mob's Relationship with Intel? Paula C Blades [SSMI1]
MochStalk 1, She Stalked Them All - Introduction [SSMS1]
MochStalk 2 She Stalked Them All - Child A [SSMS2]
Mochstalk 3 She Stalked Them All - Child B [SSMS3]
MochStalk 4 She Stalked Them All - Child C [SSMS4]
MockStalk 5 She Stalked Them All - Child D [SSMS5]
MockStalk 6 She Stalked Them All - Child E [SSMS6]
Mockstalk 7 She Stalked Them All - Child F [SSMS7]
Moch’s Myths 1 - Sarah's Antichrist Election Idiocy [SSMM1]
Mochs Myths 2 - Jessie's Dead Baby was not a Giant Rat or Troll Doll [SSMM2]
Mochs Myths 3 - Sakura RIP [SSMM3]
Moch Myths AW1 - AW's Fake Strawman Defence Goes Up in Flames [SSMMAW1]
MochProp 1 - Sarah Moch's Propaganda Edit on Jessie's Human Hunting Stories [SSMP1]
Propaganda Paula 2 - Svali Plagiarism Lies [SSPP2]
George B. Bailey Part 1 [SSBB1]
George B Bailey 2 Tags and Tantrums [SSBB2]
George Bailey 3 - The Moch Mob DO Attack Survivors and Whistleblowers [SSBB3]
Bailey's Knock Knock Conspiracy Hoax Part 1 [SSBB4]
Bailey's Knock Knock 2 - He’s Caught Again [SSBB5]
Satanic Harassment Symbolism - Full of Bull [SSGM1]
Links
2021 Apr 5 [1a] Outward Trends archive 2021 Apr 5 The Queen of the Illuminati
2021 May 17 [5a] Friday Damage Control https://web.archive.org/web/20210517121741/https://outwardtrends.blogspot.com/2021/05/friday-damage-control.html and
2021 May 4 [7a] Who Really is Somerset Belenoff? https://web.archive.org/web/20210504232903/https://outwardtrends.blogspot.com/2021/05/who-really-is-somerset-belenoff.html
[9] 2021 Jan 23 cathyfoxblog Belenoff and Q https://cathyfox.wordpress.com/2021/01/23/belenoff-and-q/
[9s] 2021 Jan 23 cathyfoxblog Belenoff and Q
[10] 2021 Apr 1 cathyfoxblog Somerset Belenoff 2 https://cathyfox.wordpress.com/2021/04/01/somerset-belenoff-2/
[10s] 2021 Apr 1 foxyfoxblog Somerset Belenoff 2
[11] 2021 Apr 2 cathyfoxblog Somerset Belenoff 3 https://cathyfox.wordpress.com/2021/04/02/somerset-belenoff-3/
[11s] 2021 Apr 2 cathyfoxblog Somerset Belenoff 3
Background
I have been attacked by various members of the Bailey / Moch mob for nearly 3 years. I did not respond. That appears to have allowed or encouraged them to think that they can get away with their false attacks, lies, libels and innuendo. Sarah Moch was asked to apologise and correct her lies in early 2023. She chose not to do so, and she continued her lies and still continues spreading her hateful lies.
The Moch mob’s lies have resulted in me and others being intimidated, harassed, stalked and threatened. Sarah Moch gave those lies to others, which has given them a false sense of what is true and what is lies. They have used them to threaten people. That is serious. If anything happens to me, or the others that have been threatened, then Sarah Moch, Paula Blades and George Bailey need to be investigated. So too does the “warrior” Grey Area Monarch who demands I take my blog down, and then threatens and lies, as well as those who have covered up the threats. I am now in the process of correcting their lies. When are they going to correct their lies and apologise?
Their ad hominem attacks, insults, disinformation, misinformation and lies have created a toxic atmosphere in which it is impossible to reasonably discuss issues around Jessie and the system. Their certainty that Jessie is not from bloodline or brought up in the system is in inverse proportion to their knowledge of the brotherhood, the illuminati, the occult, the symbolism, ritual abuse, survivors stories, magik or anything to do with the system. They claim to have researched her family tree. If Jessie is not bloodline nor from the system they need to publish that information to prove their claims or apologise.
This blog is not about defending Jessie, it is about correcting the lies and libels from the Moch mob. Many of those lies are about Jessie, and provably false. I blogged about Jessie’s story in 2020 and plainly still know more about aspects of her story than Moch’s kindergarten level knowledge. Other Moch mob lies are about me and others who write or talk genuinely about the system.
The toxic atmosphere that they have created attacking not just Jessie but other survivors is obviously damaging to survivors coming forward and telling their experiences. Do they not care, or is this their real intention?
Any corrections, or information on the Moch mob, email me on scarletsagegorwss101@proton.me